2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.09.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal fluency in Parkinson’s disease patients on/off dopamine medication

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
48
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
4
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Taken together, our findings are in line with previous evidence for impaired organization of language output in parkinsonism (Petrova et al, 2016) but suggest a more specific limitation of verbal generation. Besides corroborating previous work showing reduced verbal fluency in parkinsonism (Herrera, Cuetos, & Ribacoba, 2012), the profiles of verbal adynamia exhibited by both our patient groups were broadly in keeping with the findings documented in previous detailed case studies of patients with PSP and dynamic aphasia (Esmonde et al, 1996; Robinson et al, 2006; Robinson et al, 2015). However, our study did not differentiate parkinsonian syndromes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Taken together, our findings are in line with previous evidence for impaired organization of language output in parkinsonism (Petrova et al, 2016) but suggest a more specific limitation of verbal generation. Besides corroborating previous work showing reduced verbal fluency in parkinsonism (Herrera, Cuetos, & Ribacoba, 2012), the profiles of verbal adynamia exhibited by both our patient groups were broadly in keeping with the findings documented in previous detailed case studies of patients with PSP and dynamic aphasia (Esmonde et al, 1996; Robinson et al, 2006; Robinson et al, 2015). However, our study did not differentiate parkinsonian syndromes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Our data in PDD are in line with prior evidence for dopaminergic modulation of other cognitive functions, including letter fluency, verb processing, and various extra-linguistic executive tasks (Costa, Peppe, Dell’Agnello, Caltagirone, & Carlesimo, 2009),(Herrera & Cuetos, 2012; Herrera et al, 2012). Our finding that verbal adynamic deficits go beyond word generation to the generation of connected speech (sentences) suggests that the extent of such deficits in PDD may have been under-recognized, particularly if the severity of any deficit is modified by dopaminergic therapy.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The results demonstrate that those PD patients who are off the dopamine medication generate fewer words than those PD patients who are on their medication. The frequency of words for PD patients who are either on or off medication is not significantly different; however, differences are significantly noticed between PD patients who are off medication and healthy control patients [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Earlier studies of causality of the motor cortex in the human brain relate to motor disturbance [8] and its relevance for PD patients [8]. The loss of dopamine in the frontal-striatal cortex for PD patients affects verbal processing and plays a significant role in functioning of lexico-semantic fluency [9]. In order to test this, PD patients performed a phonemic fluency where they are asked to generate a list of words that starts with a given letter, as well as provide words in semantic categories for semantic fluency [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other measures were less sensitive; for example, our verbal fluency score detected impairment in 4 ndPD and 1 NC, with an effect size of .21. Studies of fluency impairment in nondemented PD patients are mixed, with studies reporting deficits in only letter fluency, others in only semantic fluency, others reporting deficits in both, and still others reporting no deficits; furthermore, these deficits can be affected by PD medication [15]. The reasons for the enhanced sensitivity of the Executive Composite are two-fold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%