2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.apacoust.2010.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verbal communication and noise in eating establishments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is possibly due to the fact that residents with BPSD do not interact in the same way, for instance, as an increasing group of people in a social context would do (e.g., it is not uncommon in nursing homes that large people of residents eat in silence), or else, because an increase in the number of people in the room might have reflected a switch from a verbal activity to a "quieter" one (e.g., a large group of residents watching TV all together). However, it was pointed out that the relationship between the number of people and sound levels might also be affected by the room acoustics condition of the single living rooms, which would be in line with previous studies in the literature about the acoustical capacity of dining (or living) spaces [24].…”
Section: Sound Levels and Presence In The Living Roomssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This is possibly due to the fact that residents with BPSD do not interact in the same way, for instance, as an increasing group of people in a social context would do (e.g., it is not uncommon in nursing homes that large people of residents eat in silence), or else, because an increase in the number of people in the room might have reflected a switch from a verbal activity to a "quieter" one (e.g., a large group of residents watching TV all together). However, it was pointed out that the relationship between the number of people and sound levels might also be affected by the room acoustics condition of the single living rooms, which would be in line with previous studies in the literature about the acoustical capacity of dining (or living) spaces [24].…”
Section: Sound Levels and Presence In The Living Roomssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…It also promotes conversational privacy [2]. However, the wrong soundscape choices may cause fatigue by increasing the effort necessary to carry on conversation [3], or even disrupt conversation entirely. This work contributes towards the goal of identifying the properties of background music that optimally allow conversations to continue unhindered in social settings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rindel [45] found that the typical number of persons at a table was 2-6, which was so in the cases of the restaurants listed above. To avoid the influence of the signal-to-noise ratio of the restaurant's public-address (PA) system on behaviour patterns and acoustic perception [45], the same acoustic system and background music were used in all the selected restaurants (that had background music). The type and tempo of music used [27,46] are shown in Table 1.…”
Section: Survey Sitementioning
confidence: 91%
“…It can be seen that the difference in RT T30 is less than 0.1s; therefore, the influence of reverberation time was not taken into account in this study [42][43][44]. Rindel [45] found that the typical number of persons at a table was 2-6, which was so in the cases of the restaurants listed above. To avoid the influence of the signal-to-noise ratio of the restaurant's public-address (PA) system on behaviour patterns and acoustic perception [45], the same acoustic system and background music were used in all the selected restaurants (that had background music).…”
Section: Survey Sitementioning
confidence: 99%