2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0305000918000375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Verb-based prediction during language processing: the case of Dutch and Turkish

Abstract: This study investigated whether cross-linguistic differences affect semantic prediction. We assessed this by looking at two languages, Dutch and Turkish, that differ in word order and thus vary in how words come together to create sentence meaning. In an eyetracking task, Dutch and Turkish four-year-olds (N = 40), five-year-olds (N = 58), and adults (N = 40) were presented with a visual display containing two familiar objects (e.g., a cake and a tree). Participants heard semantically constraining (e.g., "The b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…But what happens when some of the cues are late, such as when the verb is in the sentencefinal position? There is some evidence that comes from Dutch (Brouwer et al, 2019) and German (Özge et al, 2022), but these languages exhibit less flexible word order, limited case marking, and obligatory overt arguments. Turkish allows us to disentangle the timing effects of the cues that come later, i.e., when the casemarkings are at the end of the nouns and the verb is sentence-final.…”
Section: Background Conceptual Replication: Processing Of Grammatic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But what happens when some of the cues are late, such as when the verb is in the sentencefinal position? There is some evidence that comes from Dutch (Brouwer et al, 2019) and German (Özge et al, 2022), but these languages exhibit less flexible word order, limited case marking, and obligatory overt arguments. Turkish allows us to disentangle the timing effects of the cues that come later, i.e., when the casemarkings are at the end of the nouns and the verb is sentence-final.…”
Section: Background Conceptual Replication: Processing Of Grammatic...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TD children cannot only rapidly recognize words as they unfold over time, but they have also shown to be able to make predictions as to which (morpho)syntactic structure (e.g., Brouwer et al, 2017;Deevy et al, 2017;Lew-Williams & Fernald, 2007;Trueswell & Gleitman, 2004) or lexical item comes next (e.g., Borovsky et al, 2012;Brouwer et al, 2019;Fernald et al, 2008;Mani & Huettig, 2012;Nation et al, 2003). This predictive behavior is seen as one of the mechanisms why language processing is so effortless and accurate.…”
Section: Word Prediction In Td and Dld Childrenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electroencephalography). Children similarly look to relevant stimuli shortly after the onset of linguistic cues, and visual-world experiments have been used with children to study multiple levels of language processing, including phonological (e.g., McMurray et al, 2018;Sekerina & Brooks, 2007), morphological (e.g., Özge et al, 2022;Zhou et al, 2014), syntactic (e.g., Contemori et al, 2018;Snedeker & Trueswell, 2004;Trueswell et al, 1999), semantic (e.g., Borovsky et al, 2012;Brouwer et al, 2019), and pragmatic processing (e.g., Cooper-Cunningham et al, 2020;Huang & Snedeker, 2009;Kampa & Papafragou, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%