Echocardiographic Atlas of Adult Congenital Heart Disease 2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-12934-1_54
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventricular Septal Defect Device Closure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 6 Of all the variables considered for device selection, the location, morphology, as well as length and thickness of the edges of the defect are the most important ones. 7 In our centre, both angiography and TEE were used. Notably, TEE emerged as superior in measuring the defect size, as evidenced by the unexpected discovery of an oval-shaped VSD with diameters of 18 × 6 mm using 3D TEE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“… 6 Of all the variables considered for device selection, the location, morphology, as well as length and thickness of the edges of the defect are the most important ones. 7 In our centre, both angiography and TEE were used. Notably, TEE emerged as superior in measuring the defect size, as evidenced by the unexpected discovery of an oval-shaped VSD with diameters of 18 × 6 mm using 3D TEE.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, the selected device is 1–2 mm larger than the maximal diameter of the defect as assessed by TEE and angiography. 7 Initial attempts with an occluder No. 12/14 were unsuccessful, leading to device dislodgment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%