2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2010.08.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventouse Kiwi® versus forceps et spatules : évaluation de la morbidité maternelle et fœtale. À propos de 169 cas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contradictory data have been published about whether differences exist in the failure rate between each procedure. Some authors have found a greater number of cup detachments (41.7%-44%) 15,16 and a significantly higher failure rate (30.1%-44%) [15][16][17][18] with the Kiwi. However, other authors have not shown these differences in failure rates and have found success rates between 94%-100% in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contradictory data have been published about whether differences exist in the failure rate between each procedure. Some authors have found a greater number of cup detachments (41.7%-44%) 15,16 and a significantly higher failure rate (30.1%-44%) [15][16][17][18] with the Kiwi. However, other authors have not shown these differences in failure rates and have found success rates between 94%-100% in both groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The association between PPH and instrumental delivery has already been reported in the literature, in particular for the use of forceps[ 1 , 25 28 ]. In addition, the use of forceps has been associated with a greater risk of PPH than vacuum extraction[ 29 ]. We did not see an increased risk of PPH associated with vacuum extraction, but we found a significant association between PPH and forceps.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also were limited by methodologic flaws including small sample size, retrospective design, limited data quality and availability, and absence of propensity score analysis to limit the indication bias affecting choice of instrument. 4,[34][35][36][37][38] Any statistical approaches were limited to multivariable analyses controlling for some potential confounders. In these cases, results were consistent with our adjusted OR showing higher maternal morbidity with forceps-assisted delivery than with vacuum-assisted delivery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%