2023
DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0000000000001018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilatory targets following brain injury

Abstract: Purpose of reviewRecent studies have focused on identifying optimal targets and strategies of mechanical ventilation in patients with acute brain injury (ABI). The present review will summarize these findings and provide practical guidance to titrate ventilatory settings at the bedside, with a focus on managing potential brain-lung conflicts.Recent findingsPhysiologic studies have elucidated the impact of low tidal volume ventilation and varying levels of positive end expiratory pressure on intracranial pressu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We currently have limited data regarding optimal approaches in this setting, but common principles are reviewed in Figure 4. 45 45 The VENTIBRAIN study (NCT04459884) is a multicenter observational study on the optimal practice of mechanical ventilation and ventilator settings in brain-injured patients and association with patient outcomes. The VENTIBRAIN study was initiated in September 2021 and is scheduled to enroll 3,000 patients, with study completion date estimated in December 2023, and will provide extensive information to hopefully improve mechanical ventilation outcomes in these patients for the future.…”
Section: Acute and Traumatic Brain Injury Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We currently have limited data regarding optimal approaches in this setting, but common principles are reviewed in Figure 4. 45 45 The VENTIBRAIN study (NCT04459884) is a multicenter observational study on the optimal practice of mechanical ventilation and ventilator settings in brain-injured patients and association with patient outcomes. The VENTIBRAIN study was initiated in September 2021 and is scheduled to enroll 3,000 patients, with study completion date estimated in December 2023, and will provide extensive information to hopefully improve mechanical ventilation outcomes in these patients for the future.…”
Section: Acute and Traumatic Brain Injury Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal lung protective mechanical ventilation may be challenging in these patients because of the need to also manage optimal partial pressure of carbon dioxide targets in addition to intracranial pressure and cerebral blood flow targets. We currently have limited data regarding optimal approaches in this setting, but common principles are reviewed in Figure 4 45 …”
Section: Arf and Mechanical Ventilation In Special Populationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In patients with both ARDS and traumatic brain injury, optimal PaCO 2 targets with LTV ventilation should be adjusted to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral oxygen delivery using a personalized approach based on intracranial pressure and multimodal brain and cerebral monitoring. [20][21][22] Optimal and High Versus Low PEEP Current evidence supports that patients with moderate or severe ARDS (PaO 2 /FIO 2 ≤ 200) should receive higher levels of PEEP, based on a meta-analysis of individual patient data from 3 large RCTs of higher vs. lower PEEP. 23,24 Patients with moderate/severe ARDS randomized to higher PEEP had significantly lower mortality (adjusted RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00) and better oxygenation (higher P/F ratio).…”
Section: Mechanical Ventilation Low Tidal Volume Low Plateau Pressurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In trauma patients with ARDS, LTV ventilation will likely result in hypercapnia, and may have potential adverse effects in patients with traumatic brain injury. In patients with both ARDS and traumatic brain injury, optimal PaCO 2 targets with LTV ventilation should be adjusted to maintain adequate cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral oxygen delivery using a personalized approach based on intracranial pressure and multimodal brain and cerebral monitoring 20–22 …”
Section: Evidence Base: Brief Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%