2010
DOI: 10.1097/mcc.0b013e32833546fa
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilatory strategies for patients with acute brain injury

Abstract: There are unlikely to be randomized controlled trials advising how best to ventilate patients with acute brain injuries because of the heterogeneous nature of such injuries. Hypoxia should be avoided. The more widespread use of multimodal brain monitoring, including brain tissue oxygen and cerebral blood flow monitoring, may allow clinicians to tolerate a higher arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide than has been traditional, allowing a less injurious ventilatory strategy. Modest positive end-expiratory … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
(56 reference statements)
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…If contemplating its use in patients with TBI, other rescue strategies should also be considered. Prone positioning, nitric oxide, and extracorporeal techniques (including arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane carbon dioxide removal and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) have all been attempted in patients with concurrent ARDS and TBI [7]. These therapies all have their specific risks in patients with TBI: prone positioning may be particularly hazardous in patients with frontal injuries; the effects of nitric oxide on cerebral perfusion have not been fully elucidated; extracorporeal techniques usually rely on a degree of circuit heparinisation which may be hazardous in TBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If contemplating its use in patients with TBI, other rescue strategies should also be considered. Prone positioning, nitric oxide, and extracorporeal techniques (including arteriovenous extracorporeal membrane carbon dioxide removal and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation) have all been attempted in patients with concurrent ARDS and TBI [7]. These therapies all have their specific risks in patients with TBI: prone positioning may be particularly hazardous in patients with frontal injuries; the effects of nitric oxide on cerebral perfusion have not been fully elucidated; extracorporeal techniques usually rely on a degree of circuit heparinisation which may be hazardous in TBI.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Achieving these oxygenation and PaCO 2 targets in patients who have aspirated, or are developing an acute lung injury (ALI), acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), or a ventilator-associated pneumonia, are likely to result in a conflict with what is now considered best practice in lung protective ventilation [4][5][6][7]. Blood pressure support to achieve CPP targets has been associated with the development of ARDS and is another source of conflict [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypoxia (PaO 2 <60 and/ or SaO 2 <90) is associated with poor neurologic outcomes in patients with acute brain injuries (Young et al 2010). The duration of hypoxia itself is an independent predictor of mortality (Jones et al 1994).…”
Section: Respiratory Supportmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few studies have looked at this in animal and the results suggest that an increased PEEP can be safely administered as long as the PEEP does not exceed the ICP. [85][86][87] However, the interaction between lung-protective strategies and brain tissue oxygen has not been thoroughly explored. As the above-mentioned paper by Rosenthal et al 83 suggests, poor lung function is bad for brain tissue oxygen.…”
Section: Lung-protective Strategies and Brain Tissue Oxygenmentioning
confidence: 99%