2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.08.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilation, thermal and luminous autonomy metrics for an integrated design process

Abstract: This paper proposes and evaluates an integrated workflow that simultaneously uses ventilation, thermal, and luminous autonomy for the assessment of passive design strategies, introducing a potential way to integrate these three metrics in the design process. We developed a new metric, ventilation autonomy, and assessed the advantages and limitations of applying the three autonomy metrics with building performance simulations in two climates. We developed a novel visualization to display the hourly and yearly e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(50 reference statements)
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These so-called "massing studies" do not need to be geometrically detailed; their purpose is to help build consensus on which issues and ideas to prioritize and develop further. Measures for shape compactness [12] and parametric "shoe-box" models [13][14][15][16][17] can help design teams establish the proportions and parameters that govern energy efficiency. These guidelines and studies may be suitable for generic planning, real estate, or renovation projects, but may lose their relevance for cultural landmarks-such as some civic buildings, corporate headquarters, or mixed-use developments-where the team must pay special attention to the form and network of Figure 2: The functional systems of a modern building (adapted from [11]).…”
Section: Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These so-called "massing studies" do not need to be geometrically detailed; their purpose is to help build consensus on which issues and ideas to prioritize and develop further. Measures for shape compactness [12] and parametric "shoe-box" models [13][14][15][16][17] can help design teams establish the proportions and parameters that govern energy efficiency. These guidelines and studies may be suitable for generic planning, real estate, or renovation projects, but may lose their relevance for cultural landmarks-such as some civic buildings, corporate headquarters, or mixed-use developments-where the team must pay special attention to the form and network of Figure 2: The functional systems of a modern building (adapted from [11]).…”
Section: Social Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A key concept emerging in building energy resilience is "passive survivability", which denotes the ability of buildings to keep occupants safe and comfortable during a power outage [24]. "Thermal autonomy" has been proposed to assess a building's potential to keep occupants at acceptable temperatures, with the metric ultimately consisting of the time occupants are kept in these sufficient thermal conditions [24,25]. Similarly, as another time-based metric, "hours of safety" has been proposed as a metric to assess the potential of a building to keep people safe from extreme cold and heat during a power outage, attributing resilience to the performance of thermal comfort-associated building components, such as insulation [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These scores were derived using pre-defined visual and thermal thresholds, calculated for each of the six occupants of the room (Figure 3). The method is adapted from Ko et al (2018), who combined multiple environmental metrics using the concepts of luminous, thermal and ventilation autonomy (i.e., with the use of fully-passive heating and cooling) to define the comfort thresholds, and conducted a spatial analysis rather than a conventional single-node evaluation. However, in the present study, the calculation of the visual and thermal comfort scores differed from that presented by Ko et al (2018).…”
Section: Energy and Discomfort Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The method is adapted from Ko et al (2018), who combined multiple environmental metrics using the concepts of luminous, thermal and ventilation autonomy (i.e., with the use of fully-passive heating and cooling) to define the comfort thresholds, and conducted a spatial analysis rather than a conventional single-node evaluation. However, in the present study, the calculation of the visual and thermal comfort scores differed from that presented by Ko et al (2018). The "thermal comfort score" (TCscore) for each design variation was calculated on the basis of the PVM results for each hour and each occupant.…”
Section: Energy and Discomfort Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation