Effects of early versus delayed umbilical cord clamping during antepartum lower segment caesarean section on placental delivery and postoperative haemorrhage: a randomised controlled trial
M Withanathantrige
1
, I M R Goonewardene
1
IntroductionDelayed cord clamping (DCC), an inexpensive method which allows physiological placental transfusion has been described since the 1950s [1,2]. DCC is associated with increased birth weight, (mean difference 101g; 95% CI 45-157), increased new born haemoglobin (mean difference 2.2 g/dl; 95% CI 0.3-4.0 g/dl), increased new born haematocrit >45% (RR 16.2; 95% CI 2-127.4) persisting up to 48 hours, and a reduction of the risk of iron deficiency at three to six months of age (RR 2.7; 95% CI 1.0-6.7) [3]. The requirement of phototherapy for neonatal jaundice is reduced by early cord clamping (RR 0. 62; 95% CI 0.41-0.96) compared to DCC [3]. However DCC is not associated with lower Apgar Scores at 5 minutes, increased admission to special care baby units, respiratory distress, severe jaundice or long term adverse effects [3][4][5][6][7]. DCC is also not associated with increased risk of postpartum haemorrhage, blood transfusion, manual removal of placenta or increased duration of third stage of labour [3,[6][7][8]. DCC improves blood pressure, reduces the need for blood transfusions and the risk of intra-ventricular haemorrhage and necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants [9]. Furthermore, DCC maintains oxygenation by sustained placental circulation and is beneficial if spontaneous pulmonary respiration is delayed or impaired [10][11][12][13]. Recently the use of the term 'deferred' cord clamping has been recommended as this suggests a planned policy in contrast to the term 'delayed' cord clamping which may imply that the cord is clamped later than the ideal time [14].Although evidence based guidelines have recommended that DCC should be practiced for all births, in