“…In monitored classrooms in Beijing, both systems provided a too low temperature (below 18 • C) close to the beginning and the end of running heating period [105] 1.5 ach −1 MV suggested in nucleus-type hospitals, in order to provide comfort conditions [106] Personalized ventilation suggested in order to have thermal benefits for occupants [107] NV alone is not sufficient to ensure thermal comfort in a large semi-transparent ceiling ocean park case study [108] NV or HV can be adequate to provide thermal comfort [30,55,64,67,[109][110][111][112][113][114][115] During summer in Dubai, when NV is not sufficient, despite the too high outdoor temperature and too low wind, a reduction of 2-6 • C is possible in office buildings by NV [109] Definition of 7 • C outdoor temperature as lower boundary for NV to be ineffective [115] Definition of the range of applicability of NV between 10 • C and 25 • C of outdoor temperature [30] Preference for NV is often related with the higher degree of control of occupants [25,30,55,111,116] The negative effects of NV on productivity are under debate [111] A higher productivity by men workers when HV was used instead of MV was found in an office of Tokyo (Japan) [114] Dependence of thermo-hygrometric comfort on outdoor temperature and users' behavior [29,60,67] Due to global warming, NV use will decrease at warmer climates, simultaneously increasing in colder and mild areas [30] HV can be used when non-optimal conditions are achievable with NV only [67,109,117,118] Nighttime ventilation and night cooling can be exploited to enhance daily thermal comfort conditions…”