“…Compared with mechanical ventilation, [29][30][31] natural ventilation does not consume electricity and causes less disturbance to the smoke layer stratification, which can be considered as an economic and effective mode. 32,33 The natural exhausting ventilation mainly uses the buoyancy of the smoke itself, and for natural ventilation Nomenclature: A, cross-section area of the shaft (m 2 ); d, smoke layer thickness below smoke vent without smoke exhaust (m); D, longitudinal distance from fire source to shaft (m); D f , transverse distance from fire source to tunnel sidewall (m); D s , transverse distance from shaft to tunnel sidewall (m); F h , horizontal inertia force of the smoke without smoke exhaust (N); F v , vertical buoyancy force of the smoke (N); g, gravitational acceleration (m/s 2 ); h, shaft height (m); v, smoke velocity measured under the smoke vent without smoke exhaust (m/s); w, shaft width (m) Greek letters: ρso, smoke density without smoke exhaust (kg/m 3 ); Δρ, density difference between smoke and ambient air without smoke exhaust (kg/m 3 ) shaft, the driving force is the stack effect [34][35][36] formed inside the shaft, which is different from the traditional transverse ventilation mode using mechanical smoke extraction vents installed on the tunnel ceiling.…”