2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.07.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Ventilation effects in confined and mechanically ventilated fires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The powers tested are lower than 130 kW, which corresponds to a maximum HRR of 1 MW at full scale. Details on the derivation of the scaling laws can be found in [15]. Picture and scheme of the experimental setup are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The powers tested are lower than 130 kW, which corresponds to a maximum HRR of 1 MW at full scale. Details on the derivation of the scaling laws can be found in [15]. Picture and scheme of the experimental setup are presented in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Inlet duct is located at the bottom of the room test at a 0.3 meter high and extraction network is located near the ceiling, at a 1.7 meter height. The acquisition time is chosen at 6 s. This reduced-scale compartment has already been used in Lassus et al [15] for the investigation of the ventilation effects in confined and mechanically ventilated fires. Let us notice that with this experimental setup air is injected at the bottom of the compartment and the extraction duct is located at the top of the compartment, on the side opposite to the air inlet duct.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, all these experiments were conducted in open atmosphere conditions, and very few studies were performed in confined and mechanically ventilated rooms, such as those found in NPPs. In contrast, many investigations, using hydrocarbon (Pretrel et al, Nasr et al, Melis and Audouin, Lassus et al), alcohol, polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), or wood (Delichatsios et al) as fuel, were conducted in mechanically ventilated compartments. These fire tests showed a significant influence of the ventilation on both the combustion behaviour and species product formation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with mechanical ventilation, natural ventilation does not consume electricity and causes less disturbance to the smoke layer stratification, which can be considered as an economic and effective mode . The natural exhausting ventilation mainly uses the buoyancy of the smoke itself, and for natural ventilation shaft, the driving force is the stack effect formed inside the shaft, which is different from the traditional transverse ventilation mode using mechanical smoke extraction vents installed on the tunnel ceiling …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with mechanical ventilation, [29][30][31] natural ventilation does not consume electricity and causes less disturbance to the smoke layer stratification, which can be considered as an economic and effective mode. 32,33 The natural exhausting ventilation mainly uses the buoyancy of the smoke itself, and for natural ventilation Nomenclature: A, cross-section area of the shaft (m 2 ); d, smoke layer thickness below smoke vent without smoke exhaust (m); D, longitudinal distance from fire source to shaft (m); D f , transverse distance from fire source to tunnel sidewall (m); D s , transverse distance from shaft to tunnel sidewall (m); F h , horizontal inertia force of the smoke without smoke exhaust (N); F v , vertical buoyancy force of the smoke (N); g, gravitational acceleration (m/s 2 ); h, shaft height (m); v, smoke velocity measured under the smoke vent without smoke exhaust (m/s); w, shaft width (m) Greek letters: ρso, smoke density without smoke exhaust (kg/m 3 ); Δρ, density difference between smoke and ambient air without smoke exhaust (kg/m 3 ) shaft, the driving force is the stack effect [34][35][36] formed inside the shaft, which is different from the traditional transverse ventilation mode using mechanical smoke extraction vents installed on the tunnel ceiling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%