2022
DOI: 10.1177/02676591211059743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation experience in a community level I trauma center

Abstract: Background There is limited literature of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in a community, non-university, setting in the trauma population. Methods We reviewed our cases over 2 years from March 2018 to March 2020. This study was conducted in a community hospital with a General Surgery residency with no direct affiliation to a medical school. Primary outcome reviewed was survival to discharge. Secondary outcomes included duration of extracorporeal membranous oxygenation (ECMO) support, blood … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 18 publications
(29 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main limitation is that the indications for ECLS in trauma are still considered relatively rare, even in Level 1 trauma centres. 3 The case series may have been biased by patient selection and may have been too small to support recommendations or real conclusions. 4 The only way to make evidence-based recommendations is to use data from registries, such as the ELSO Registry and the newly developed Trauma Addendum, to draw conclusions that support the recommendations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main limitation is that the indications for ECLS in trauma are still considered relatively rare, even in Level 1 trauma centres. 3 The case series may have been biased by patient selection and may have been too small to support recommendations or real conclusions. 4 The only way to make evidence-based recommendations is to use data from registries, such as the ELSO Registry and the newly developed Trauma Addendum, to draw conclusions that support the recommendations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%