2021
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd001689.pub4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for women at risk during pregnancy and the early postnatal period

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 110 publications
1
37
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An updated Cochrane review on VTE prophylaxis during pregnancy and puerperium recently reported on the efficacy of antenatal ± postnatal heparin prophylaxis in 476 women from four clinical trials. 64 A wide indication for LMWH included primary prevention, prevention of pregnancy complications; thus, some women with thrombophilia, known family history of VTE, or caesarean section were at increased risk. In this meta-analysis, the use of LMWH versus no treatment or placebo was associated with a relative VTE risk (RR) of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.08–1.98).…”
Section: Risk Of Recurrent Vte Despite Thromboprophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An updated Cochrane review on VTE prophylaxis during pregnancy and puerperium recently reported on the efficacy of antenatal ± postnatal heparin prophylaxis in 476 women from four clinical trials. 64 A wide indication for LMWH included primary prevention, prevention of pregnancy complications; thus, some women with thrombophilia, known family history of VTE, or caesarean section were at increased risk. In this meta-analysis, the use of LMWH versus no treatment or placebo was associated with a relative VTE risk (RR) of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.08–1.98).…”
Section: Risk Of Recurrent Vte Despite Thromboprophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this meta-analysis, the use of LMWH versus no treatment or placebo was associated with a relative VTE risk (RR) of 0.39 (95% CI: 0.08–1.98). 64 The review concluded that the evidence of heparin prophylaxis is still very uncertain regarding risk–benefit analysis. Trials with moderate to high bias were observed.…”
Section: Risk Of Recurrent Vte Despite Thromboprophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 In my practice, I would offer prophylactic dose LMWH with natural conception or at the start of ART, not only for the prevention of RPL but also for the protection of the patient from thromboembolic complications, such as pulmonary embolism, based on the recommendations from the ACCP and ESHRE guidelines and data from systematic review. 28 Case Vignette 3 A 31-year-old woman presented with history of ART complicated by repeated implantation failure, two chemical pregnancies, and a 9-week pregnancy loss after IVF with preimplantation genetic screening. Hysterosalpingogram was unremarkable.…”
Section: Piazza's Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an updated Cochrane sys tem atic review of avail able ran dom ized trials, the lim ited evi dence remains "very uncer tain about the ben efits and harms of VTE thromboprophylaxis" dur ing preg nancy and the post par tum period. 24 More spe cifi cally, there are dif fer ences in how the lim ited data are interpreted, which can lead to dif ferent guide line rec om men da tions. This includes issues of pub li cation date, what sta tis ti cal strat e gies are used to com bine mul ti ple VTE RFs together, what VTE risk thresh old is set to rec om mend LMWH, if a VTE scor ing sys tem is used, and the role of expert and patient opin ion.…”
Section: Clinical Casementioning
confidence: 99%