2020
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01201-2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous thromboembolism in SARS-CoV-2 patients: only a problem in ventilated ICU patients, or is there more to it?

Abstract: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a well-known complication in hospitalised patients [1-5]. Risk factors include older age, obesity, immobilisation, active malignancy, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), (major) surgery, thrombophilia and a history of thromboembolism [2, 5]. In 1884, Rudolph Virchow first described the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms, which consist of endothelial cell dysfunction/ inflammation, low blood flow and blood hypercoagulability. Current guidelines recommend the use… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
83
1
4

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
83
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, MIDDELDORP et al [11], report a cumulative incidence of any venous thromboembolism (VTE) event (symptomatic or asymptomatic) of 10% at 2 weeks in a non-ICU population versus 48% in the ICU, whereas BOMPARD et al [13] report an 18% cumulative incidence of PE in non-ICU patients versus 50% in ICU. This is further supported by the study of CRIEL et al [16], also published in this edition of European Respiratory Journal, comparing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) rates between ICU patients (13%) and ward patients (4%). One obvious question is whether these rates of thrombosis are higher than we would expect?…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…For instance, MIDDELDORP et al [11], report a cumulative incidence of any venous thromboembolism (VTE) event (symptomatic or asymptomatic) of 10% at 2 weeks in a non-ICU population versus 48% in the ICU, whereas BOMPARD et al [13] report an 18% cumulative incidence of PE in non-ICU patients versus 50% in ICU. This is further supported by the study of CRIEL et al [16], also published in this edition of European Respiratory Journal, comparing deep venous thrombosis (DVT) rates between ICU patients (13%) and ward patients (4%). One obvious question is whether these rates of thrombosis are higher than we would expect?…”
mentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Previous analyses have estimated a significant lower incidence of acute PE in the ICU population, which generally increase in mechanically ventilated patients [34,35]. The high incidence of acute PE in critically ill patients may reflect a more severe pro-coagulant state [36][37][38][39]. Indeed, as shown by the general characteristics of the patients reviewed, both active cancer and previous venous thromboembolic events were uncommon and unlikely to explain the burden of thromboembolic complications beyond a contributing role.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Many institutions have reported an uncharacteristically high rate of VTE events in both medical ward and ICU COVID-19 patients. [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Although there is a significant risk of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients with COVID-19, some evaluations have identified a higher number of pulmonary emboli (PE) than DVT. 34.35.43,44 This discrepancy between…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%