2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2021.07.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous thromboembolism associates with SARS-CoV-2 more than seasonal influenza

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, it is not surprising that a platelet‐derived protein would be up‐regulated in COVID‐19, as opposed to influenza. 48 , 49 These findings, combined with our data, suggest that both RAGE and PPBP are potential biomarkers to predict severity of COVID‐19. As RAGE and PPBP levels have been measured before in bronchoalveolar fluid in previous studies, future research should focus upon measuring these markers in bronchoalveolar fluid from patients in the early stage of COVID‐19 to predict disease severity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, it is not surprising that a platelet‐derived protein would be up‐regulated in COVID‐19, as opposed to influenza. 48 , 49 These findings, combined with our data, suggest that both RAGE and PPBP are potential biomarkers to predict severity of COVID‐19. As RAGE and PPBP levels have been measured before in bronchoalveolar fluid in previous studies, future research should focus upon measuring these markers in bronchoalveolar fluid from patients in the early stage of COVID‐19 to predict disease severity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Several studies suggest that the incidence of thrombotic complications in hospitalised patients with COVID‐19 patients is higher than in patients hospitalised with influenza. Therefore, it is not surprising that a platelet‐derived protein would be up‐regulated in COVID‐19, as opposed to influenza 48,49 . These findings, combined with our data, suggest that both RAGE and PPBP are potential biomarkers to predict severity of COVID‐19.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The effect size was quantified using the pooled odds ratio (OR) along with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Some studies ( 18 , 20 , 21 , 24 , 25 , 27–29 ) reported the length of hospital or ICU stays as a median with a range. To consolidate data, we estimated the mean and variance using a validated formula based on the reported median, range, and sample size ( 33 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Recent studies reported that COVID-19 patients were 3 to 6 times more likely to develop any arterial or venous thrombosis compared to patients affected by other infectious respiratory illnesses. [13][14][15][16] Although extensive, most of the data indicating a higher thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19 has been gathered based on comparisons with cohorts of patients with other respiratory infections in the pre-COVID-19 era. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] While studies of this kind have provided valuable initial insight into the hemostatic changes caused by COVID-19, an important limitation to the use of historical cohorts is the change in practice patterns over the years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16] Although extensive, most of the data indicating a higher thrombotic risk associated with COVID-19 has been gathered based on comparisons with cohorts of patients with other respiratory infections in the pre-COVID-19 era. [13][14][15][16][17][18][19] While studies of this kind have provided valuable initial insight into the hemostatic changes caused by COVID-19, an important limitation to the use of historical cohorts is the change in practice patterns over the years. As a result, differences in hospital protocol regarding disease management, thromboprophylaxis regimen, and diagnostic method for thrombosis to which COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients were subjected could impact the incidence of thrombotic events in these study groups, and thus influence how we interpret the thrombotic risk associated with the clinical conditions in question.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%