2018
DOI: 10.3233/blc-180184
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous Thromboembolism and Peri-Operative Chemotherapy for Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Population-based Study

Abstract: Background:Chemotherapy and major pelvic surgery are established risk factors for venous thromboembolism (VTE). We evaluate the incidence rate, timing, and factors associated with VTE in patients with bladder cancer who underwent radical cystectomy and peri-operative chemotherapy in routine clinical practice.Methods:Electronic records of treatment were linked to the population-based Ontario Cancer Registry to identify all patients who underwent cystectomy for bladder cancer in Ontario 1994–2013. VTE events wit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results in the present and other series indicate that neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy might have a further prolonged effect on the occurrence of VTE [20][21][22][23][29][30][31], possibly due to cisplatin-induced apoptosis and vascular necrosis mediated by the cytotoxic effect of caspases and calpain or vascular damage from central venous catheters or other mechanisms of hypercoagulability [17,18]. Similar results have been found with carboplatin and gemcitabine [19].…”
Section: Results Of the Study In Relation To Previous Findingssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results in the present and other series indicate that neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy might have a further prolonged effect on the occurrence of VTE [20][21][22][23][29][30][31], possibly due to cisplatin-induced apoptosis and vascular necrosis mediated by the cytotoxic effect of caspases and calpain or vascular damage from central venous catheters or other mechanisms of hypercoagulability [17,18]. Similar results have been found with carboplatin and gemcitabine [19].…”
Section: Results Of the Study In Relation To Previous Findingssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Such treatment must include cisplatin, which may induce damage to the vascular endothelium, in conjunction with central venous catheters and other tumour-related factors, which may all increase the risk of VTE [17,18]. This might explain some of the pathophysiology behind the reported 90-or 180-day cumulative incidences for VTE between 9.6%-26% related to such treatment [19][20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sizable amount of patients whom commence chemotherapy and never make it to RC is an interesting group to hypothesize upon. These findings call into question the generalizability of prior publications in this space that have utilized the actual RC as a start point for cohort assembly 19‐21,29 . When comparing predictors of initiation versus completion of NC, we see a significant difference in baseline characteristics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Chemotherapy is associated with a significantly increased risk of atheroembolic events in bladder cancer patients 14‐19 . Numerous additional factors contribute to the risk of thromboembolic events in this patient population including the following: age, frailty, smoking history, pelvic surgery, immobility, obesity, and cardiovascular comorbidities 11‐13,16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are many possible explanations for the large variations in the rates of VTE observed within this group: for example, the heterogeneity of risk factors in this population that could affect the rate of VTE such as minimal invasive (robotic) cystectomy or open radical cystectomy [10]. Additionally, 33 of the included studies did not state, discuss or categorise BC patients according to confounding factors that alter the rate of VTE such as receiving surgical thromboprophylaxis for 14 or 28 days, which then makes it difficult to compare rates between studies [13,[15][16][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]. All included studies, with the exception of two [19][20], did not clearly discuss or state the thromboprophylaxis measures employed.…”
Section: Discussion Of the Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%