2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2020.06.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous thromboembolism and coronavirus disease 2019 in an ambulatory care setting - A report of 4 cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
37
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Increased thromboembolic events were also documented with the SARS, MERS, and influenza A H1N1 viruses. [76][77][78][79][80][81] The true risk of VTE in patients with COVID-19 is difficult to determine since no placebo-controlled randomized trials have been conducted. Rates of VTE in general medical ward patients with COVID-19 have been reported to be around 4% in clinically evaluated patients and as high as almost 15% in patients screened with CUS (Table 3).…”
Section: Risk Of Vtementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…[29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44] Increased thromboembolic events were also documented with the SARS, MERS, and influenza A H1N1 viruses. [76][77][78][79][80][81] The true risk of VTE in patients with COVID-19 is difficult to determine since no placebo-controlled randomized trials have been conducted. Rates of VTE in general medical ward patients with COVID-19 have been reported to be around 4% in clinically evaluated patients and as high as almost 15% in patients screened with CUS (Table 3).…”
Section: Risk Of Vtementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Risk assessment should be performed with symptomatic patients with COVID-19 treated at home, since a number of them may still have several VTE risk factors, including immobility, and are at risk of thromboembolic events. 52,[79][80][81] Support for the paradigm that a higher intensity of anticoagulation than standard prophylactic doses of heparin comes from previously published evidence from the H1N1 influenza pandemic in 2009. 82 An observational cohort study of critically ill patients with severe ARDS from H1N1 viral pneumonia demonstrated that empiric systemic heparinization titrated to a goal heparin level of 0.3 -0.7 anti-Xa units/mL was significantly better at reducing VTE rates than standard prophylactic doses of either UFH or LMWH.…”
Section: Accepted Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…10 av pasientene med hjerteaffeksjon (59 %) hadde kronisk hjertesykdom. Fire pasienter (6 %) utviklet tromboemboli; to av disse er rapportert i en tidligere artikkel (17). Delir eller konfusjon var ikke en del av de predefinerte komplikasjonene i registeret.…”
unclassified