2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00595-021-02260-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous thromboembolism after esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review of the literature to evaluate incidence, risk factors, and prophylaxis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Malignancy is also a well-known risk factor for VTE however and interestingly a recent large series of patients noted a prevalence of preoperative DVT in the lung cancer population of 9.6% (46). A systematic review in esophagectomy patients identified age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, history of cardiopulmonary disease and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as risk factors for postoperative VTE (47).…”
Section: Prevention Of Venous Thromboembolism (Vte)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Malignancy is also a well-known risk factor for VTE however and interestingly a recent large series of patients noted a prevalence of preoperative DVT in the lung cancer population of 9.6% (46). A systematic review in esophagectomy patients identified age, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, history of cardiopulmonary disease and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy as risk factors for postoperative VTE (47).…”
Section: Prevention Of Venous Thromboembolism (Vte)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only de nitive treatment is extensive surgery with preoperative chemotherapy, sometimes combined with radiotherapy (2). However, surgery increases the risk of thrombosis, and it is therefore imperative to offer cancer patients undergoing surgery optimal thromboprophylaxis, without compromising safety, to improve survival (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2022, the rst systematic review on purely oesophageal cancer estimated the VTE risk to be approximately 4% (3). However, both reviews could only identify 14 relatively heterogenous studies (3,18). This relatively small sample size, combined with great variation in received thromboprophylactic regimens makes it di cult to precisely estimate the incidence of VTE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 30-day postoperative VTE incidence was 4.5% and 2.3%, after esophagectomy and gastrectomy, respectively, which compares favorably with the NESQIP data reported by De Martino et al (7.3% and 2.7%, respectively) and from a recent review by Theochari et al (4% after esophagectomy). 4 , 5 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Final details that could be further investigated are the types of recommended anticoagulation as well as the implementation of scoring systems based on patient characteristics and biomarkers to predict risk. 5 , 7 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%