1980
DOI: 10.1007/bf01402077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venous malformation of the aqueduct of sylvius treated by interventriculostomy: 15 years follow-up

Abstract: A single venous shunt obstructing the aqueductus of Sylvius was treated by interventriculostomy. A passage for CSF was obtained between the third and fourth ventricles. The catheter which was left in the aqueduct collapsed the malformation, possibly preventing a future haemorrhage. A Simple rubber catheter in the aqueduct of Sylvius has been well tolerated by the patient for 15 years.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
(1 reference statement)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Medial parietal vein draining into the superior sagittal sinus (2) kinking which occurs at specific points of right angle change of direction of blood flow, plus or minus mechanical fixation.…”
Section: Venous Eetasiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Medial parietal vein draining into the superior sagittal sinus (2) kinking which occurs at specific points of right angle change of direction of blood flow, plus or minus mechanical fixation.…”
Section: Venous Eetasiasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The notion that a DVA can produce symptoms by itself is controversial, but isolated reports have described either obstructive hydrocephalus, venous infarction, hemorrhage, or other symptoms arising from a DVA without another associated vascular abnormality [3,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15]. Based on our case and these other isolated reports, it would appear that stenosis or occlusion of one of the venous radicles or the main trunk of the lesion could result in venous hypertension or ischemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Considerable risks were involved. We also find these indications in the rather rare new publications (1,2,3,5). We ourselves, referring back to the indications of Norldn (19), would like to expand the indication in this group of patients with a tumour in the posterior cranial fossa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%