2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2004.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Venice channel side-wall assessment with GPR technique—a case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“… Where uncertainty exists relating to the identity of the features then future work is needed to consider linking the presence of anomalies with additional datasets such as LiDar, X-ray [31], thermal imaging [7] and ultrasonic [32,33].  The 1.2GHz antenna was proven as a tool for investigations deep within the wall, whilst the 2.3GHz demonstrated a capacity for providing highly detailed analysis of the features present within the near surface material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Where uncertainty exists relating to the identity of the features then future work is needed to consider linking the presence of anomalies with additional datasets such as LiDar, X-ray [31], thermal imaging [7] and ultrasonic [32,33].  The 1.2GHz antenna was proven as a tool for investigations deep within the wall, whilst the 2.3GHz demonstrated a capacity for providing highly detailed analysis of the features present within the near surface material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This noise appeared to be either coupling- or electronic-dependent (Seppi and others, 2015). The standard running average filter (Daniels, 1996; Francese and others, 2004) was not effective at removing these high-amplitude bands. An automatic routine was therefore coded for removing this specific noise.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The time series were processed using ad hoc modules (Francese et al , ) coded in the open‐source environment of the CWP‐SU (Colorado School of Mines/Centre for Wave Phenomena – Seismic Unix) package (Stockwell and Cohen, ). Particular effort was devoted to the removal of the horizontal banding (Francese et al , ) using a moving‐average filter.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This caused poor antenna coupling (Stockwell and Cohen, 2008). Particular effort was devoted to the removal of the horizontal banding (Francese et al, 2004) using a moving-average filter.…”
Section: Multichannel Ground-penetrating Radar (Gpr)mentioning
confidence: 99%