2006
DOI: 10.1093/jiplp/jpl171
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Veni, vidi, wiki

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A more optimistic view is that while a wiki may be exposed to vandalism and abuse, related group ethics should assure real‐time control and correction to maintain and improve quality while at the same time reducing the rights of malicious users (Ramos and Piper, 2006). Secondly an often mentioned problem is intellectual property (Phillips, 2006) since the editors – in effect the whole community – share the authorship. The fact that an individual editor often has no moral or legal right to a wiki‐based article or that authorship cannot even be established may demotivate users.…”
Section: The Wiki As An Intranet Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A more optimistic view is that while a wiki may be exposed to vandalism and abuse, related group ethics should assure real‐time control and correction to maintain and improve quality while at the same time reducing the rights of malicious users (Ramos and Piper, 2006). Secondly an often mentioned problem is intellectual property (Phillips, 2006) since the editors – in effect the whole community – share the authorship. The fact that an individual editor often has no moral or legal right to a wiki‐based article or that authorship cannot even be established may demotivate users.…”
Section: The Wiki As An Intranet Conceptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is even more the case for a Web 2.0 solution where users themselves create the content. If a large number of editors is involved the final information quality will either be the truth or at least the perception of the truth most widely held by those people most concerned with the publicly accessible formulation (Phillips, 2006). However, a wiki's contents are always in development phase because a wiki's structure and content are continually changing.…”
Section: Analysing the Wiki's Usefulness With The Delone And Mclean Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jeremy Phillips (2006) believes that intellectual property is a body of law that meshes with the concept of the wiki:…”
Section: Copyright Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%