2005
DOI: 10.1177/153100350501700407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vena Cava Filters: Why, When, What, How?

Abstract: Peoria, IL; Lackland Airforce Base, 7X; and Chicago, IL Pulmonary emboli, a potentially lethal venous thromboembolic complication, is a potentially preventable morbidity or mortality that surgeons should consider in the perioperative period or in high-risk patients. Prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter placement offers a high protection rate against fatal pulmonary emboli. This manuscript discusses the indications for filter placement, different types of currently available IVC filters, and problems an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complications of filter placement include immediate issues such as problems with filter positioning, filter tilting, and technical malfunctions. 21 In addition, IVC filters increase the risk for later deep venous thrombosis 5,6 as well as rarer complications such as insertion site thrombosis, 22 perforation of the inferior vena cava, 22,23 and filter migration to the heart or lungs. 24,25 These complications highlight the importance of ensuring timely removal of filters in appropriate patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complications of filter placement include immediate issues such as problems with filter positioning, filter tilting, and technical malfunctions. 21 In addition, IVC filters increase the risk for later deep venous thrombosis 5,6 as well as rarer complications such as insertion site thrombosis, 22 perforation of the inferior vena cava, 22,23 and filter migration to the heart or lungs. 24,25 These complications highlight the importance of ensuring timely removal of filters in appropriate patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,32 Additionally, IVC filters are not completely protective for PE. 24,33 Although there are studies investigating the outcomes of IVC filter placement in the bariatric patient population, most of these studies are not randomized and are underpowered to confirm a significant difference in the rates of PE and related outcomes with and without prophylactic IVC filters. 8,14,28,34 They are also of limited follow-up in a patient population with a reasonably long life expectancy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9,13,24,25,33,37 Conversely, our study analyzed BOLD, the largest prospective longitudinal database available and a very well maintained comprehensive repository of bariatric surgery patient information from centers across the United States. 7,16,17 However, a common criticism of such large administrative data resources is lack of specificity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17.3). 10 With respect to their fi ltering ability against emboli, the basket, and multilayered designs are considered more effi cient than the conical design. 11…”
Section: Permanent Fi Ltersmentioning
confidence: 99%