2014
DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(14)70051-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vemurafenib in patients with BRAFV600 mutated metastatic melanoma: an open-label, multicentre, safety study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
227
2
24

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 255 publications
(272 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
19
227
2
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Data from patients with metastatic melanoma treated with vemurafenib show QTc prolongations in 3.2% on average and QTc >500 ms in 2.3%, with only 0.06% incidence of arrhythmias 119, 120…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from patients with metastatic melanoma treated with vemurafenib show QTc prolongations in 3.2% on average and QTc >500 ms in 2.3%, with only 0.06% incidence of arrhythmias 119, 120…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…22 Two studies with only univariate analyses, the larger including more than 3000 patients treated with vemurafenib, reported that ECOG, AJCC stage, LDH, and brain metastases were associated with PFS and OS, but followup was limited (median, 11.5 months; maximum, 21 months), and the influence of subsequent active treatments on OS was not taken into account. 16 A pooled analysis of patients from the phase 2 and 3 vemurafenib clinical trials suggested that the only factor influencing the duration of response (12 vs <12 months) and PFS with vemurafenib was LDH, but only a univariate analysis was performed. 23 The serum LDH level is a major factor influencing metastatic survival without treatment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consecutive immunotherapy-and MAPK inhibitor-naive patients with V600 BRAF-mutant metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage IIIC unresectable melanoma or stage IV melanoma) who were treated with a BRAF inhibitor either as monotherapy or in combination with an MEK inhibitor at 2 centers (Melanoma Institute Australia and Westmead Hospital) during clinical trials between July 2009 and July 2013 were included for analysis. The clinical trials included phase 1 to 3 and phase 2 brain metastasis trials of dabrafenib, 2,11-13 phase 2/3 and phase 2 brain metastasis trials and an expanded access program for vemurafenib, 1,[14][15][16] and phase 1 to 3 trials of combined dabrafenib and trametinib (CombiDT). 3,4,17 Demographics, primary melanoma features, disease characteristics at the time of study commencement, responses to therapy, subsequent systemic therapy responses, and survival data were collected prospectively.…”
Section: Patients and Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dacarbazin kezeléssel történő ösz-szehasonlító Fázis III klinikai vizsgálatban a válaszadási ráta 50% volt a dabrafenibbel kezelt betegeknél, míg 6% volt a kemoterápiával kezelt csoportban, a PFSm 5,1 hónap volt BRAF inhibitor kezelés mellett, 2,7 hónap dacarbazin kezelés mellett (18). BRAF-gátló terápia mellett a betegek legalább 2/3 ré-szénél (67-90%) jelentkezik valamilyen mellékhatás, mely többnyire tolerálható, azonban az esetek egyharmadában dó-zismódosításra van szükség (19,20). Leggyakrabban bőr-gyógyászati mellékhatásokkal kell számolnunk, melyek az összes mellékhatás több mint 90%-át teszik ki.…”
Section: Braf Inhibitor Kezelés (Hatékonyság Mellékhatás)unclassified