Aiaa Space 2016 2016
DOI: 10.2514/6.2016-5299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VELOX-II: Challenges of developing a 6U nanosatellite

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dynamic deflection of a solar panel under vibration causes stress on the solar cells mounted on the panel by the bounded junction, which could ultimately lead to a crack or fracture in those cells. In the case of previously developed deployable solar panels for CubeSat applications, the mechanical design strategy for the deflection minimization was to increase the panel stiffness by applying additional stiffeners made up of various materials like aluminium, carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic, or fiberglass laminate [11,12]. However, this strategy typically led to an increase in the mass and development cost of the solar panel, which might be disadvantageous for Cube-Sats with an extremely restricted budget.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic deflection of a solar panel under vibration causes stress on the solar cells mounted on the panel by the bounded junction, which could ultimately lead to a crack or fracture in those cells. In the case of previously developed deployable solar panels for CubeSat applications, the mechanical design strategy for the deflection minimization was to increase the panel stiffness by applying additional stiffeners made up of various materials like aluminium, carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic, or fiberglass laminate [11,12]. However, this strategy typically led to an increase in the mass and development cost of the solar panel, which might be disadvantageous for Cube-Sats with an extremely restricted budget.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) panel and honeycomb panel are comparatively lightweight and exhibit high rigidity. Lim et al [10] developed deployable solar panels for VELOX-II 6U CubeSat based on an aluminum honeycomb panel instead of the PCB to ensure the stiffness requirement specified by the launch provider. The two deployable solar panels of the VELOX-II could produce a peak power of 40.8 W. The VELOX-II CubeSat deployable solar panel module per unit mass is only 500 g. However, solar panels based on CFRP and honeycomb are relatively thick and expensive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to overcome this issue, several mechanical design strategies, such as increasing the eigenfrequency of the solar panel by implementing stiffeners made of aluminum or fiberglass-laminate [15,16], using carbon fiber-reinforced plastic (CFRP) and honeycomb panels, or employing multiple holding and release mechanisms (HRMs) to provide additional mechanical fixation points have been practiced by considering the design specification and mission requirements. However, the implementation of the additional stiffener approach involves a tradeoff between the panel's stiffness and weight, which might be a disadvantage for the CubeSat as it has a restraint mass budget.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%