2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-6875-1_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity Restriction-Based Improvised Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, DPSO's limits do not change in scale over time and only restrict each particle's maximum viable search space for the next iteration relative to its current location [12]. Velocity restriction-based improvised PSO (VRIPSO) uses a dynamic method of limiting velocity and relies on an escape velocity mechanism to explore beyond its velocity limit [13]. Alternatively, DPSO warps individuals who appear to be stagnating, while VRIPSO occasionally allows particles to escape the imposed velocity limit.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, DPSO's limits do not change in scale over time and only restrict each particle's maximum viable search space for the next iteration relative to its current location [12]. Velocity restriction-based improvised PSO (VRIPSO) uses a dynamic method of limiting velocity and relies on an escape velocity mechanism to explore beyond its velocity limit [13]. Alternatively, DPSO warps individuals who appear to be stagnating, while VRIPSO occasionally allows particles to escape the imposed velocity limit.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another feature found in VRIPSO is that it adjusts momentum over time [13]. Continuous PSO has a more in-depth version of this momentum feature in that it determines a gradient by which to adjust the momentum factors, encouraging movement in directions with greater improvements and not just in the current direction [14].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vaez [47] proposed a new method based on GA combined with PSO for detection of damage in thin plates based on modal data. Besides its advantages, PSO also has some limitations as it may fall into local optimum and the search precision is not too high [48][49][50]. Furthermore, the PSO algorithm is easily stuck at the boundary conditions of the mathematics objective function, and once this problem has occurred during PSO implementation, the convergence is significantly reduced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%