2006
DOI: 10.1190/1.2405336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity determination for pore-pressure prediction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
25
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They also derived the effective stress from measured pore pressure data and calculated overburden stress (equation 3) based on sonic interval velocities from well log data in the Gulf of Mexico (equation 2). They further demonstrated that the sonic velocity and effective stress have the following power-law relationship: where V p is compressional velocity at a given depth, V 0 is compressional velocity in mudline or unconsolidated saturated surface sediments, σ e is effective stress, A (m 2 .s/kg) and B (dimensionless) are empirical constants calibrated with offset velocity versus effective stress data (Chopra and Huffman, 2006).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also derived the effective stress from measured pore pressure data and calculated overburden stress (equation 3) based on sonic interval velocities from well log data in the Gulf of Mexico (equation 2). They further demonstrated that the sonic velocity and effective stress have the following power-law relationship: where V p is compressional velocity at a given depth, V 0 is compressional velocity in mudline or unconsolidated saturated surface sediments, σ e is effective stress, A (m 2 .s/kg) and B (dimensionless) are empirical constants calibrated with offset velocity versus effective stress data (Chopra and Huffman, 2006).…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several methods in literature dealing with the pre-drill prediction of abnormal pore pressure from seismic survey data (see Eaton Eaton 1975;Bowers 1995;ENI 1999;Kan et al 1999;Dvorkin et al 1999;Carcione and Helle 2002;Sayers et al 2002;Chopra and Huffman 2006;Sundaram and Jain 2008;Lu et al 2009;Babu and Sircar 2011;Brahma et al 2013). Comparing of the measured physical properties of subsurface formations in the abnormal pressure region with the normally pressurized formation properties is the general approach in all the overpressured prediction methods.…”
Section: Geologic and Structural Setting At Beni-suef Basinmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obecnie najlepszym przestrzennym źró-dłem pola prędkości są dane sejsmiczne. W przypadku sejsmiki 2D posiadamy dwuwymiarowy rozkład pola pręd-kości (co przy dużej liczbie profili daje przybliżony obraz trójwymiarowy), a w przypadku danych 3D otrzymujemy (6) przestrzenny rozkład pola prędkości. Najlepsze rezultaty w określeniu rozkładu ciśnień porowych daje zastosowanie prędkości z inwersji sejsmicznej i inwersji tomograficznej na danych sejsmicznych przed składaniem.…”
unclassified
“…Prędkości te w praktyce analizowane są z dużym krokiem poziomym, a ich rozdzielczość pionowa uwarunkowana jest tzw. centrami energetycznymi, które obrazują najlepsze dopasowanie refleksów tras sejsmicznych w procesie analiz prędkości [6,10]. Nie zawsze tak jest.…”
unclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation