2009
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.80.032904
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity dependence of the energy loss of very slow proton and deuteron beams in Cu and Ag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
37
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Substantial progress has been made for weakly non-adiabatic problems such as the chemistry of vibrationally excited molecules landing on metal surfaces [1], but not in the stronger coupling regime of radiation damage. Recently, the electronic stopping power for swift ions in gold has been carefully characterized by experiments [2][3][4], showing flagrant discrepancies with the established paradigm for such problems [5,6], and only qualitative agreement with time-dependent tight-binding studies [7], and with detailed studies for protons based on first principles [8], leaving very fundamental questions unanswered in spite of the apparent simplicity of the system. Most notably the H/He anomaly: the present understanding predicts a stopping power for H higher than for He at low velocities [6], which strongly contradicts the recent experiments [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Substantial progress has been made for weakly non-adiabatic problems such as the chemistry of vibrationally excited molecules landing on metal surfaces [1], but not in the stronger coupling regime of radiation damage. Recently, the electronic stopping power for swift ions in gold has been carefully characterized by experiments [2][3][4], showing flagrant discrepancies with the established paradigm for such problems [5,6], and only qualitative agreement with time-dependent tight-binding studies [7], and with detailed studies for protons based on first principles [8], leaving very fundamental questions unanswered in spite of the apparent simplicity of the system. Most notably the H/He anomaly: the present understanding predicts a stopping power for H higher than for He at low velocities [6], which strongly contradicts the recent experiments [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) was verified for protons and deuterons in C and Al, down to very low energies [3,11], while in noble metals a departure from this dependence was observed [2,[6][7][8]. A physical explanation of this behavior was given considering the behavior of the nearly-free d electrons in those metals [2,6].…”
Section: Theoretical Aspectsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In fact, the main experimental difficulties at low energies arise from the greater influence of target roughness due to the requirement of using very thin targets, leading to disadvantageous roughness to thickness ratios. For this reason, although there are several accurate measurements of stopping powers down to very low energies ($1-2 keV) [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11], there are very few experimental determinations of straggling values for energies below 10 keV [12]. Also, as shown by Konac et al [12], there are significant discrepancies in low-energy straggling data reported by different groups, which gradually disappear at larger energies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…A special attention is paid to the electronic stopping of light ions with low velocities in noble metals (Au, Ag and Cu). In noble metals, the measured SP of slow protons has shown unexpected deviations from the velocity proportionality, and a complex structure of the SP versus ion velocity is observed in the range of low energies [23][24][25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%