Velocity dependence of the dynamic magnetic field acting on swift O and Sm ions

Z=50core stability inSn110from magnetic-moment and lifetime measurements

“…Also included are the slopes for full clovers and precession angles. ∆θ(g=1) was calculated using the Rutgers parametrization [28]. The lifetimes are taken from the National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC) data base [27,29].…”

Magnetic moment and lifetime measurements of Coulomb-excited states inCd106

“…At a beam energy of 400 MeV, the adopted g(2 + 1 ) value of +0.393(31) (Ref. [6]) was reproduced using the Rutgers parametrization [11]. In runs at 410 MeV with various beam intensities, this g factor was taken to monitor the magnetization, which is a sensitive function of the beam-spot temperature.…”

“…Also included are the slopes for full clovers and the precession angles. ∆θ(g = 1) was calculated using the Rutgers parametrization [11]. The literature values of the meanlives are taken from the National Nuclear Data Center (NNDC) data base [7].…”

Low-energy structure of the even-ARu96−104isotopes viaTaylor1, Gürdal2, Kumbartzki3 et al. 2011Phys. Rev. CSelf Cite

“…As the targets have different magnetizations and therefore B T F scales, the field strengths were normalised to the gadolinium saturation magnetization value of 0.2116 T. The solid line in Fig. 3 represents the effective transient field, as a function of ion velocity, using the Rutgers parametrization [10] and a g factor of +0.53. This g factor is larger than that obtained by the analysis based on the 106 Pd g factor from IPAC measurements (dashed line in Fig 3).…”

“…The results from the IMPAC measurements were subsequently re-analyzed on the basis of the LindhardWinther [7] model for the transient field by Hubler et al [8]. This model, however, is now known to give an incorrect velocity dependence for the transient field [9,10]. The g factor of the first excited 2 + 1 state in 96 Ru had not been measured prior to the present experiment.…”