SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2015 2015
DOI: 10.1190/segam2015-5864923.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Velocity Analysis and Update with 3D DAS-VSP to Improve Borehole/Surface Seismic Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results were compared against those from 3D VSP transit-time inversion (Leany, 2008;Li et al, 2015), which represents the current industry standard for model calibration and anisotropic property updates with 3D and WA VSP data. As expected, both solutions explained adequately the VSP data, yielding comparable close-tozero TT misfit.…”
Section: Joint Tomography With Simultaneous Updates and The Production Emb Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were compared against those from 3D VSP transit-time inversion (Leany, 2008;Li et al, 2015), which represents the current industry standard for model calibration and anisotropic property updates with 3D and WA VSP data. As expected, both solutions explained adequately the VSP data, yielding comparable close-tozero TT misfit.…”
Section: Joint Tomography With Simultaneous Updates and The Production Emb Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the last decade, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) has proven to be an effective alternative in geophysics sensing technology, especially for vertical seismic profile (VSP), with its dense spatial sampling, large channel counts from a single cable and laser interrogation, therefore potentially offer higher quality data with better access than conventional point measurements. Many applications of fibre optic DAS have been reported, including imaging subsurface structures using borehole and surface data (Li et al ., 2015; Yu et al ., 2020), seismic data acquisition (Daley et al ., 2013; Mateeva et al ., 2013; Daley et al ., 2016, Merry et al, 2020), reservoir monitoring (Mateeva et al ., 2013; Mateeva et al ., 2017), fractures monitoring (Jin & Roy, 2017), flow characterization (Paleja et al ., 2015) and time lapse monitoring (Chavarria et al ., 2019; Zhou et al ., 2019; Chang & Nakata, 2020). In addition to its dense spatial sampling advantage, DAS also has operational cost benefit when the optical fibre is freely accessible (Lim and Sava 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the recent technological advances in DAS, multicomponent DAS remains a missing piece of the puzzle to capture the full character of the seismic wavefield. In borehole application specifically, the usage of DAS focuses mainly on reservoir imaging (Mestayer et al 2011;Mateeva et al 2012Mateeva et al , 2013Wu et al 2015;Zhan, Kommedal and Nahm 2015;Jiang et al 2016) and velocity model updates (Li et al 2015;Wu et al 2015). Although, many examples show that DAS has the potential to provide low-cost reservoir monitoring (Hornman et al 2015;Chalenski et al 2016;Dou et al 2016), the conventional single component DAS measurements makes reservoir characterisation challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%