2010
DOI: 10.1504/ijvas.2010.034099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vehicle side slip angle estimation with stiffness adaptation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, four-contact models provide a better description of vehicle dynamics, but obviously at the cost of a greater number of parameters and an increase in the complexity of the systems. For instance, the authors in [ 17 ] use an EKF applied to a four-contact vehicle model with a Dugoff tire model in order to estimate the sideslip angle and the tire/road forces. The authors in [ 18 ] again use a four-contact model, but with a semiphysical nonlinear tire model called “Unitire”, and apply a reduced-order sliding mode observer (SMO), evaluating the performance of the proposed method by means of simulation and experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, four-contact models provide a better description of vehicle dynamics, but obviously at the cost of a greater number of parameters and an increase in the complexity of the systems. For instance, the authors in [ 17 ] use an EKF applied to a four-contact vehicle model with a Dugoff tire model in order to estimate the sideslip angle and the tire/road forces. The authors in [ 18 ] again use a four-contact model, but with a semiphysical nonlinear tire model called “Unitire”, and apply a reduced-order sliding mode observer (SMO), evaluating the performance of the proposed method by means of simulation and experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the KF is very simple to be used and implemented; moreover, its robustness, stability, and ability to deal with input and measurement noise make it the most used observer for VSA estimation [18]. This statement is also supported by [25], where after a comparison between the EKF, LO, and SMO concerning the VSA estimation using a non-linear single-track model, EKF achieved a smaller estimation error than the LO and SMO.…”
Section: Kalman Filtermentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Nonetheless, the KF observers are still relatively simple to implement. In summary, the most used observer for VSA estimation is the KF, due to its ability to use input and measurement noise information directly, and because it is robust, stable, and relatively simple to implement [15,18,19].…”
Section: Observer-based Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations