1976
DOI: 10.2307/3897273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetative Response under Various Grazing Management Systems in the Edwards Plateau of Texas

Abstract: Forage production under five different grazing management schemes was compared after 20 years of treatment in the Edwards Plateau region of Texas. Results from this study showed that: (1) a more dense ground cover does not always result in higher forage production; (2) forage yields and litter accumulation were lower on a natural area than under deferred rotation or light grazing; (3) greatest amounts of decreaser plants were found in deferred rotation pastures; (4) natural areas have limited value in range re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1978
1978
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3a). Martin (1973), Owensby et al (1973), Reardon andMerrill (1976), andTrlica et al (1977) have found that spring-summer rest promoted growth of major season species, as occurred in this study. Important relative biomass changes (after/ before rest) were found in Saint Augustine grass (10/20), bluestem (30/75), and dallisgrass (7/450).…”
Section: Spring-summer Restsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…3a). Martin (1973), Owensby et al (1973), Reardon andMerrill (1976), andTrlica et al (1977) have found that spring-summer rest promoted growth of major season species, as occurred in this study. Important relative biomass changes (after/ before rest) were found in Saint Augustine grass (10/20), bluestem (30/75), and dallisgrass (7/450).…”
Section: Spring-summer Restsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Prior to establishment of the three study pastures in 1948, they had been subjected to longterm heavy, continuous grazing. At the time of this study, 27 years later, the exclosure and the deferred-rotation pasture had improved greatly in range condition (Smeins et al 1975;Reardon and Merrill 1976). The two pastures also had similar and favorable hydrologic properties ( Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…There was greater existing litter for the Low management intensity during the majority of the grazing season, and the lesser SR for Low compared with other intensities may partially explain this result. Lesser SR and greater herbage mass often cause more litter to be deposited because of a lesser forage utilization rate and an increase in senescent herbage (Reardon and Merril, 1976;Thomas, 1992). Rezende et al (1999) found a significant increase in litter deposition when SR was halved from 4 to 2 animals ha 21 .…”
Section: Existing Litter Massmentioning
confidence: 99%