Vegetation, water infiltration, and soil carbon response to Adaptive Multi-Paddock and Conventional grazing in Southeastern USA ranches

Apfelbaum, Steven I.; Thompson, Ry; Wang, Fugui; Mosier, Samantha; Byck, Peter

doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114576

Cited by 20 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 54 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Conventional management had 44% greater ratios of glucose‐induced:basal activities ( p = 0.009) and 7% greater glucose:phenol substrate‐induced activities ( p = 0.010; Table 5) than AMP management which indicate strong limitation of C mineralization activities by the amount of labile C such as root exudates. This explanation is consistent with the decreased vegetation biomass reported under conventional compared to AMP management at these same farms (Apfelbaum et al., 2022). Greater labile C limitation reduces soil C processing and the formation of microbial biomass, which is the predecessor of microbial necromass and the formation of stabilized soil organic matter.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

“…Detailed information on the farm selection process, including matching soil types and slopes, is described in Apfelbaum et al. (2022). For this study, AMP management had >40 paddocks, stocking densities >60 animal units ha −1 , stocking rates >1 animal unit ha −1 , and a rest/grazed ratio >40 days for the grasslands.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Detailed information on the vegetation present at each location is provided in Table S2 and further description of the influence of grazing management on grassland vegetation is available in Apfelbaum et al. (2022).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Soil microorganisms respond distinctively to adaptive multi‐paddock and conventional grazing in the southeastern United States

White

Yeater

Lehman

2023

Soil Science Soc of Amer J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Variable results from studies of the associations between grazing management and soil microbiological properties in grasslands suggest the need for further investigation. We assessed the response of soil microbiological properties to conventional and adaptive multi‐paddock (AMP) grazing management practices at paired farms at five locations in the southeastern United States. We measured total DNA and abundances of fungi and bacteria by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) as proxies for soil microbial biomass, potential carbon, nitrogen, and phosphorus cycling activities using qPCR of functional genes, and carbon mineralization activities by respiratory assays. Abundances of fungi (p = 0.009) and bacteria (p = 0.001) were greater under AMP management compared to conventional management; however, there was no difference in the fungal/bacterial ratios between management practices. Gene copies encoding for nitrification, denitrification, and phosphate hydrolysis were significantly greater (p < 0.05) under AMP compared to conventional management. Basal soil respiration was elevated (p = 0.004) under AMP compared to conventional management presumptively due to the greater abundance of microbes that were actively transforming plant exudates and residues. In contrast, labile carbon limitation of respiratory activities was greater (p ≤ 0.01) under conventional compared to AMP management indicating decreased processing of soil carbon and formation of microbial biomass. Using discriminant function analysis, the 19 biological response variables successfully classified 94% of the 180 soil samples according to grazing management. In summary, AMP grazing management influenced the numbers and key activities of soil microbes in a distinctive manner that is associated with the retention of soil organic carbon and nitrogen reported in these grazed grasslands.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 90%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Soil microorganisms respond distinctively to adaptive multi‐paddock and conventional grazing in the southeastern United States

White

Yeater

Lehman

2023

Soil Science Soc of Amer J

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…There were intense periods of grazing followed by a long period of rest, which allowed the pasture fully recover [ 13 ]. There is evidence that grazing can also be used to improve soil health and sequester carbon [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Another sustainability benefit of well-managed grazing is increased plant biodiversity [ 15 , 16 , 17 ].…”

Section: Insight From Learning That Animals Are Part Of the Landmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…There is evidence that grazing can also be used to improve soil health and sequester carbon [ 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. Another sustainability benefit of well-managed grazing is increased plant biodiversity [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. There is also an abundance of scientific evidence that shows that rotating crops, such as corn or soy, with livestock grazed on cover crops can improve soil health [ 18 ], sequester carbon [ 14 , 19 ], and increase the abundance of pollinating insects [ 20 ].…”

Section: Insight From Learning That Animals Are Part Of the Landmentioning

confidence: 99%

Grazing Cattle, Sheep, and Goats Are Important Parts of a Sustainable Agricultural Future

Grandin

2022

Animals

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Many people believe that animal agriculture should be phased out and replaced with vegetarian substitutes. The livestock industry has also been attacked because it uses vast amounts of land. People forget that grazing cattle or sheep can be raised on land that is either too arid or too rough for raising crops. At least 20% of the habitable land on Earth is not suitable for crops. Rotational grazing systems can be used to improve both soil health and vegetation diversity on arid land. Grazing livestock are also being successfully used to graze cover crops on prime farmland. Soil health is improved when grazing on a cover crop is rotated with conventional cash crops, such as corn or soybeans. It also reduces the need for buying fertilizer. Grazing animals, such as cattle, sheep, goats, or bison, should be used as part of a sustainable system that will improve the land, help sequester carbon, and reduce animal welfare issues.

show abstract

Opportunities to increase soil carbon sequestration in grazing lands in the southeastern United States

Silveira,

Rodrigues da Cruz,

Vendramini

et al. 2024

Grassland Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundGrazing lands provide numerous ecosystem services, including the capacity to store large amounts of soil carbon (C); however, our understanding of the factors affecting soil C responses to management is inadequate.MethodsIn this paper, we synthesized information about the impacts of grazing land management on soil C within the southeastern region of the United States.ResultsMost studies (68%) demonstrated that proper management increased soil C stocks with an average C accumulation rate of 1.4 Mg C ha−1 year−1. The remaining (32%) studies showed no effect of management on soil C. None of the studies reported negative impacts of management on soil C. The largest increase in soil C (8 Mg C ha−1 year−1) was associated with the conversion of cropland to pastureland while overseeding legumes into grass pastures resulted in the lowest C sequestration rates (0.2 Mg C ha−1 year−1).ConclusionsConsidering the rates of soil C accretion and the extensive area occupied by grazing lands, data in this synthesis confirm that the adoption of improved management practices can increase soil C sequestration in the southeastern United States. In addition, because most improved management practices can also have co‐benefits, they may be favorable for forage and livestock production and other ecosystem services.

show abstract

Vegetation, water infiltration, and soil carbon response to Adaptive Multi-Paddock and Conventional grazing in Southeastern USA ranches

Cited by 20 publications

References 54 publications

Soil microorganisms respond distinctively to adaptive multi‐paddock and conventional grazing in the southeastern United States

Soil microorganisms respond distinctively to adaptive multi‐paddock and conventional grazing in the southeastern United States

Grazing Cattle, Sheep, and Goats Are Important Parts of a Sustainable Agricultural Future

Opportunities to increase soil carbon sequestration in grazing lands in the southeastern United States

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About