2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-100x.2006.00130.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation Succession After Bauxite Mining in Western Australia

Abstract: Alcoa World Alumina Australia has been rehabilitating bauxite mines in the jarrah forest of Western Australia for more than 35 years. An experiment was established in 1988 using three different seed treatments (legume and small understorey mix, small understorey mix only, and no seed) and two fertilizer treatments (N and P, and P only). The objectives of this study were to (1) document vegetation changes in the first 14 years after bauxite mining; (2) assess whether the vegetation is becoming more similar to t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
86
3
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(109 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
4
86
3
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of restoration success assessments have been conducted around the world evaluated the extents of native plants community re-establishment following quarry reclamation treatments. Some of the findings were indicative of successional shift of community in the direction of the pre-mining conditions [4], while other results were contrary to established ecological understanding. In south western Virginia for example, although the research by [5] recorded increases in pioneer native species in nurse-trees reclaimed coal mines, the study did not report a corresponding increase in intermediate and late succession trees or shrubs species in same area.…”
contrasting
confidence: 51%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of restoration success assessments have been conducted around the world evaluated the extents of native plants community re-establishment following quarry reclamation treatments. Some of the findings were indicative of successional shift of community in the direction of the pre-mining conditions [4], while other results were contrary to established ecological understanding. In south western Virginia for example, although the research by [5] recorded increases in pioneer native species in nurse-trees reclaimed coal mines, the study did not report a corresponding increase in intermediate and late succession trees or shrubs species in same area.…”
contrasting
confidence: 51%
“…3) To evaluate and compare soil seed bank, soil depth and soil organic matter accumulation under the different nurse-plants. 4) To compare species richness and evenness between plots of different rehabilitation ages 2 -45 years after quarry restoration, irrespective of treatment type.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was mainly due to the remarkable differences that still existed between the remediated soils and those at the undisturbed site. Failure to restore the original community on mine sites has been attributed by other authors to radical changes to almost every component of the landscape as well as persistent non-natural features [8,16,27,40,56]. The radical changes to the landscape and non-natural feature were still characteristic of the area under study.…”
Section: Number Of Families Species Richness (S) Species Diversity (H)mentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this context, proper assessments can only be a matter of extrapolation and speculation without longer term evidence incorporating species' life cycles and replacements. To this extent, as pointed out by Norman et al (2006) and , the currently used predictive criteria and short monitoring time frames are unlikely to be sufficient in the assessment of rehabilitation success.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%