2018
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/ary075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation structure mediates a shift in predator avoidance behavior in a range-edge population

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Together, these findings raise two possibilities: Missing legs has no impact on survival at all, or there is behavioral and/or mechanical compensation to alleviate these costs. For example, after autotomy, harvestmen could be deciding to roost on substrates such as the mossy trees that provide more crypsis from predators, as found for other animals (Cooper, 2007;Houghton et al, 2011;Johnston & Smith, 2018;Stoks, 1999). However, our data do not allow distinguish these possibilities.…”
Section: Autotomy and Future Survivalmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Together, these findings raise two possibilities: Missing legs has no impact on survival at all, or there is behavioral and/or mechanical compensation to alleviate these costs. For example, after autotomy, harvestmen could be deciding to roost on substrates such as the mossy trees that provide more crypsis from predators, as found for other animals (Cooper, 2007;Houghton et al, 2011;Johnston & Smith, 2018;Stoks, 1999). However, our data do not allow distinguish these possibilities.…”
Section: Autotomy and Future Survivalmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…If crabs do find thermal shelter in the water, a strategy used to limit overheating in the summer [12], they could still experience increased mortality as aquatic predation on A . pisonii is high, particularly in the salt marsh [45]. Thus, even if crabs in the marsh can retreat to warmer water, the warmer aerial conditions under docks likely force this retreat less often, reducing secondary impacts of predation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interactions on mangrove structure were more likely to include the low-cost shield posturing than other structure types where crabs progressed more quickly to higher-cost behaviors. Losing competitors were also less likely to mount a conciliatory retreat on marsh structure than mangroves, possibly due to the reduced structural area provided by marsh grasses for retreat/evasion behaviors [33] and potentially increasing the possibility of reigniting the interaction. These reductions of ritual complexity and tendencies to progress more quickly to higher-cost behaviors could increase the chance of injury and energetic cost of the interaction [34] thus negating some of the benefit of ritualizing aggressive behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A competitor was more likely to fall into the water on dock and marsh structure than the mangrove, likely due in part to the decreased footing they provide (low surface area on marsh structure, vertical nature of docks). This would elevate the potential danger of an interaction by increasing the chance that one or both competitors are exposed to aquatic predation, which is also higher in the colonized ecosystem [33]. Thus, as instigators of interactions are more likely to win independent of their size or habitat of origin, and as longer interactions are more likely to result in the loser falling into the water, the higher danger of interactions on marsh and dock structure may encourage crabs to act more aggressively in the interest of increasing their chance of victory [31,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%