2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2020.118871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation structure and temporality influence the dominance, diversity, and composition of forest acoustic communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our results, we compare three forests, an autochthonous deciduous forest, with two replanted pine tree forests at 200 m higher altitudes, showing that acoustic biodiversity and intensity were higher in the deciduous forest, the Herrería Forest. This result agrees with previous studies showing how higher canopy covers and tree heights, summed to forest maturity can positively affect the biophony (Figueira et al 2015; Hao et al 2021). This higher ‘health’ of Herrería Forest compared to the other locations was consistently observed in 2020 and 2021, but furthermore, this ‘health’ reached the highest values in 2020.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our results, we compare three forests, an autochthonous deciduous forest, with two replanted pine tree forests at 200 m higher altitudes, showing that acoustic biodiversity and intensity were higher in the deciduous forest, the Herrería Forest. This result agrees with previous studies showing how higher canopy covers and tree heights, summed to forest maturity can positively affect the biophony (Figueira et al 2015; Hao et al 2021). This higher ‘health’ of Herrería Forest compared to the other locations was consistently observed in 2020 and 2021, but furthermore, this ‘health’ reached the highest values in 2020.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In summer, a quiet but present dawn chorus occurred only in the intact vegetation. Such result suggest that the increased heat of the summer highlighted the vulnerabilities of the burned area, possibly impeding shelter of sonoriferous species due to the lack of canopy since canopy structure can drive differences in faunal behavior 41,42 . Despite this vulnerability, at night, populations of crickets and cicadas, singing at high frequencies ( Figure 5A) , matched the dynamics of the intact area, highlighting the presence of active insect populations.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that the sampled environments have different sources of biophony and anthropophony. This may happen because Sobradinho (SO) and Plano Piloto (PP) are more arborized showing greater biophony (Hao, Wang, Sun, van den Bosch, et al, 2021; Hao, Wang, Sun, Zhao, et al, 2021). Another alternative is that structures that make up the environment reduce anthropophony and are less prone to noise, indicating that vegetation acts as a barrier to the propagation of sounds (Margaritis et al, 2018; Ow & Ghosh, 2017; Watts et al, 1999).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%