Vegetation dynamics at two mud volcanoes of Sakhalin Island (Russia): comparison of chronosequences

Korznikov, Kirill A.

doi:10.17581/bp.2017.06203

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 28 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The most common factors that the authors of individual studies mention as being responsible for the slow recovery of vegetation cover in sites after landslides, mudflow, or heavy erosion are climate (Cannone et al, 2010), erosion (Navarro Hevia et al, 2014), and a high pH combined with highly saline soil and spatial scale issues (Korznikov, 2017). The factors that authors of individual studies claim as being responsible for the slow recovery of vegetation cover on lava volcano flows, dunes, and sandy landfilled sites are substrate issues and nutrient limitation (Le Chen et al, 2017; Otaki et al, 2016) or biotic factors (Dale & Adams, 2003).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a measure of initial vegetation cover development over time, we computed the initial slope of vegetation cover recovery (abbreviated also as initial slope) as described below. This selection process yielded 105 studies describing 244 chronosequences with data about total vegetation cover: 135 for post‐mining sites (Alday, Pallavicini, et al, 2011; Antwi et al, 2014; Baasch et al, 2010; Baasch et al, 2012; Boscutti et al, 2017; Brady & Noske, 2010; Densmore, 1994; Densmore, 2005; Frouz et al, 2008; Frouz et al, 2011; Frouz et al, 2020; Gentili et al, 2020; Graf et al, 2008; Hodačová & Prach, 2003; Holl & Cairns Jnr, 1994; Jochimsen, 2001; Lei et al, 2016; Li et al, 2008; Liu et al, 2016; Lopes et al, 2020; Martínez‐Ruiz et al, 2007; Moreno‐de las Heras et al, 2008; Novianti et al, 2018; Nyenda et al, 2020; Proteau et al, 2020; Scotton, 2018; Šebelíková et al, 2018; Skousen et al, 1990; Strong, 2000; Takeuchi & Shimano, 2009; Triisberg‐Uljas et al, 2011; Wang et al, 2018; Wiegleb & Felinks, 2001; Yuan et al, 2006), 25 for other man‐made and post‐industrial sites (Hougen & Matlack, 2012; Prach et al, 2007; Salisbury et al, 2021; Spiering et al, 2020), 3 for dunes and sandy landfilled sites (Álvarez‐Molina et al, 2012; Le Chen et al, 2017; Rebele & Lehmann, 2002), 8 for landslides, mudflows, and heavy erosions (Cannone et al, 2010; Korznikov, 2017; Lopes et al, 2020; Navarro Hevia et al, 2014), 3 for lava volcano flows (Cutler et al, 2008; Dale & Adams, 2003; Otaki et al, 2016), 12 for glacier retreats (Fickert, 2020; Fischer et al, 2019…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Potential of vegetation and woodland cover recovery during primary and secondary succession, a global quantitative review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Succession is a basic natural process of ecosystem recovery, it may start completely de novo (primary succession) or after serious disturbance of the previous ecosystem (secondary succession). Despite most reclamation and restoration approaches depending on it and despite extensive previous research, we found no worldwide review that would describe the pattern of vegetation cover and woody vegetation recovery in individual types of succession and explore major factors that affect the speed of vegetation recovery. To fill this gap we have searched world literature and extracted data about 244 succession series about total vegetation cover and 113 about woody vegetation cover. The rate of vegetation cover recovery is significantly slower during primary succession than during secondary succession, this however not apply to woody vegetation. The type of disturbance affects the speed of recovery, post‐mining sites recover fastest among primary succession and older fields were the fastest among secondary succession, the slowest one being succession in glacier retreats. Latitude, soil pH, the size of the disturbed area, temperature, and actual evapotranspiration affect the rate of vegetation recovery in primary succession, while only latitude affects secondary succession. Some other factors affect succession after a specific disturbance. The study shows that succession can be an effective tool to restore vegetation cover and woody vegetation on many occasions. We expect that differences in the nutrient availability determine differences in the rate of total vegetation cover recovery, while soil porosity (compaction) may be an important factor affecting woody vegetation recovery.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Potential of vegetation and woodland cover recovery during primary and secondary succession, a global quantitative review

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Calcium oxalate in the bark of stone birch (Betula ermanii): morphology, age trends, and biomineralization dynamics under salt stress in mud volcanic environments

Kopanina,

Sokol,

Talskikh

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The patterns of crystalline Сa oxalate (whewellite) accumulation can be a proxy of tolerance in plants exposed to stress from drought, high salinity, climate changes, pollution, etc. Age-dependent variations in the distribution and morphology of Сa oxalate in the bark of Betula ermanii growing in salt stress conditions in the Yuzhno-Sakhalinsky mud volcano were investigated for the first time and compared with the respective data from a typical environment (southern Sakhalin Island, northeastern Asia). The samples of bark were analyzed by: inductively coupled plasma optical emission and mass spectrometry, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, light microscopy. The specific number of Сa oxalate in the bark was found out to decrease systematically with age (1–147-150 year), being the highest in the parenchyma of young (1–5 year) crown branches. The decreasing age-trend of Сa oxalate in conducting phloem follows the logarithmic law and correlates with carbon flows along the phloem. The bark of trees growing in the mud volcano accumulates many elements which have higher enrichment than in the typical area: 1.2–1.6 times for K, Mg, Zn, Na, and S, 2–3 times for Ba, Ca, Sr, B, and Sb, 10 times for Li. The Сa oxalate show morphological diversity: single crystals, contact twins, spherulites nucleated around organic clots. Spherulites mainly occur in parenchyma near apical and lateral meristems. They may represent a dynamic system of emergency storage/release of C and Ca which the plants can use for metabolism and growth as a prompt response to salt stress associated with mud volcanic activity.

show abstract

Vegetation dynamics at two mud volcanoes of Sakhalin Island (Russia): comparison of chronosequences

Cited by 2 publications

References 28 publications

Potential of vegetation and woodland cover recovery during primary and secondary succession, a global quantitative review

Potential of vegetation and woodland cover recovery during primary and secondary succession, a global quantitative review

Calcium oxalate in the bark of stone birch (Betula ermanii): morphology, age trends, and biomineralization dynamics under salt stress in mud volcanic environments

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About