2017
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.13910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegetation demographics in Earth System Models: A review of progress and priorities

Abstract: Numerous current efforts seek to improve the representation of ecosystem ecology and vegetation demographic processes within Earth System Models (ESMs). These developments are widely viewed as an important step in developing greater realism in predictions of future ecosystem states and fluxes. Increased realism, however, leads to increased model complexity, with new features raising a suite of ecological questions that require empirical constraints. Here, we review the developments that

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
587
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 538 publications
(627 citation statements)
references
References 227 publications
2
587
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A quarter century of theory and observation linking species diversity and canopy traits to production has substantially advanced the mechanistic understanding of these relationships, while exposing the limitations of conventional species diversity and canopy structural features as indicators of ecosystem functioning (Loreau et al 2001, Hooper et al 2005. Our observation that structural complexity measures outperform conventional canopy traits as predictors of NPP suggests that ecosystem models, which characterize structure in vastly different ways (Fisher et al 2018), may enhance their mechanistic rigor by representing vegetation in multiple spatial dimensions. In particular, remote sensing tools such as lidar and hyperspectral imaging offer novel ways to characterize canopy structure, and their broad adoption by ecologists is key to the development and scrutiny of functionally focused canopy traits (Asner et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A quarter century of theory and observation linking species diversity and canopy traits to production has substantially advanced the mechanistic understanding of these relationships, while exposing the limitations of conventional species diversity and canopy structural features as indicators of ecosystem functioning (Loreau et al 2001, Hooper et al 2005. Our observation that structural complexity measures outperform conventional canopy traits as predictors of NPP suggests that ecosystem models, which characterize structure in vastly different ways (Fisher et al 2018), may enhance their mechanistic rigor by representing vegetation in multiple spatial dimensions. In particular, remote sensing tools such as lidar and hyperspectral imaging offer novel ways to characterize canopy structure, and their broad adoption by ecologists is key to the development and scrutiny of functionally focused canopy traits (Asner et al 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This suggests that environmental filtering and species interactions mainly act largely independently in shaping the growth of recruited stems in this lowland rainforest, which has important implications for improving predictions of the future dynamics of tropical forests (Fisher et al. ). Nevertheless, the interaction between topographic variables and neighborhood crowding strongly influenced individual growth for 91 of the 1,047 species that together represent 17.0% of the stems at Yasuní, suggesting that these community assembly mechanisms can interact in shaping species dynamics in highly diverse tropical rainforests.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving the characterization of forest structure and accounting for gross structural transitions in climate models is crucial to instilling greater confidence in predictions that inform prospective mitigation and adaptation policies involving the forestry sector. The concept of integrating forest “age cohorts” into land models is important for being able to account for time‐dependent structural dynamics in secondary forests (Fisher et al, ; McGrath et al, ; Yue et al, ). The use of NFI data to constrain structural parameters of forest age cohorts can help ensure that the simulated structural transitions match those seen in practice.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%