Veganomics : vers une approche économique du véganisme ?

Treich, Nicolas

doi:10.3917/rfe.184.0003

Cited by 5 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 48 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…De nombreux sous-champs de l'économie pourraient se saisir de ces opportunités (e.g., économie comportementale, économie des politiques publiques, économie industrielle, économie politique). De manière similaire, Treich (2018) propose une approche économique du véganisme qu'il appelle veganomics.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

L’éléphant dans la pièce. Pour une approche économique de l’alimentation végétale et de la condition animale

Espinosa¹

2019

Revue d'Économie Politique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

À paraître dans la Revue d'Économie PolitiqueRésumé Cet article propose une discussion sur l'alimentation végétale et la condition animale comme objets d'étude pour la science économique. Il répond à trois questions : Pourquoi les économistes devraient-ils s'intéresser à la question de la consommation de produits d'origine animale ? Quelle peut être la contribution de l'économie aux discussions académiques existantes ? Quelles raisons peuvent expliquer le peu d'intérêt porté jusque-là par les économistes à cette problématique ?Ce travail expose tout d'abord trois arguments pour lesquels la science économique devrait prendre en compte la consommation de produits d'origine animale : une raison environnementale, une raison sanitaire et une raison éthique. Il présente ensuite l'analyse comportementale de la consommation de viande développée en psychologie, puis discute comment l'économie pourrait contribuer à ce champ de recherche (économie comportementale, économie des politiques publiques, économie industrielle et économie politique). La dernière partie propose une discussion plus exploratoire sur le faible intérêt porté jusqu'à aujourd'hui par les économistes à ces questions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

L’éléphant dans la pièce. Pour une approche économique de l’alimentation végétale et de la condition animale

Espinosa¹

2019

Revue d'Économie Politique

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Because animal welfare is a global public good that benefits all those who care (Farm Animal Welfare Committee of the United Kingdom, 2011), public intervention at a supranational scale is preferable. Following Treich (2018), emphasized that intervention at the European level would avoid "the double penalty of unilateral actions by a single country; first, an economic penalty induced by competitiveness distortions, and second, an animal penalty, insofar as competing countries that are less regulated would have an incentive to produce more animal products so that, ultimately, animal welfare would be globally degraded. "…”

Section: ❚ Farm Animal Welfarementioning

confidence: 99%

Evolving the Common Agricultural Policy for Tomorrow's Challenges

Détang-Dessendre¹,

Guyomard²

2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Measures that are more specific complete the picture targeting specific support for certain products, production methods, or specific local conditions. Among others, some target Organic Farming (OF), young farmers, or specific investments. Other measures provide aid to farmers in less-favoured areas or aid to compensate for the additional costs of adopting more environmentally friendly practices. • The CAP and the economyThe 1992 reform of the CAP was initially a response to an external constraint to allow the successful conclusion of the multilateral agricultural negotiations of the 1994 Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, also known as GATT, and the compatibility of the future CAP with this agreement . The path taken at that time (that is, the decoupling of the agricultural income support policy) is the same that is followed today, even though the global context has changed markedly, with the rise of new agricultural export (Argentina, Brazil) and import (China) players; the failure of the multilateral negotiations of the Doha Round at the World Trade Organization (WTO); 4 the multiplication of bilateral trade agreements; and more recently, the unilateral setting of customs duties by certain countries in a climate of (at least latent) trade warfare. For completeness, it should also be noted that the European agricultural sector is facing new and significant economic challenges that it is struggling to meet: first, fluctuations in agricultural prices and incomes in an EU that is less protected by customs duties today than it was previously (even if these remain significant for several products and non-tariff protection still exists); and second, difficulties in creating value in the context of a saturated domestic food market and in distributing the value created in a balanced way between the different actors of the production, processing, and distribution chains.The economic aspects of the CAP and European agriculture are the subject of the first part of this book. Following a brief history of the CAP from its origins to the present day in Chapter 1, Chapter 2 deals with the question of the dependence of farm incomes on CAP support, and Chapter 3 examines agricultural employment dynamics. Chapter 4 covers trade aspects and the competitiveness of European agriculture on the international scene. Chapter 5 examines the distribution of value, and Chapter 6 discusses the crisis and risk management instruments.

show abstract