2017
DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2017.1287064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vegan men and hybrid masculinity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
65
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Supporting the extension of masculinity threat research to SC, men are less motivated to engage in SC when their masculinity is threatened, and more likely to engage when their masculinity is affirmed (Brough, Wilkie, Ma, Isaac, & Gal, ). For instance, men who experience masculinity threat are less likely to buy “green” products (Brough et al., ) and to favor meat‐eating (Nakagawa & Hart, ), which is culturally equated with masculinity (Greenebaum & Dexter, ). One explanation for these preferences may be that men anticipate greater discomfort when engaging in “feminine” pro‐environmental behaviors compared to women engaging in “masculine” behaviors (Johnson et al., ).…”
Section: Gendered Differences In Sc Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Supporting the extension of masculinity threat research to SC, men are less motivated to engage in SC when their masculinity is threatened, and more likely to engage when their masculinity is affirmed (Brough, Wilkie, Ma, Isaac, & Gal, ). For instance, men who experience masculinity threat are less likely to buy “green” products (Brough et al., ) and to favor meat‐eating (Nakagawa & Hart, ), which is culturally equated with masculinity (Greenebaum & Dexter, ). One explanation for these preferences may be that men anticipate greater discomfort when engaging in “feminine” pro‐environmental behaviors compared to women engaging in “masculine” behaviors (Johnson et al., ).…”
Section: Gendered Differences In Sc Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is argued that some of these norms explicitly relate to male fertility, that is, to men's ability to make women pregnant (Cragun and Sumerau 2017), to the role of men as the head of and provider for their (biological) families, to men having offspring and an heir (Schmitz 2016), or to men's ability to have an erection and to ejaculate (Clarke, Marks, and Lykins 2015;Johnson Jr 2010). Moreover, norms that legitimize men's powerful positions may also adhere to other lived features like being strong (Wetherell and Edley 1999), tall (Talbot and Quayle 2010), rational (Bird 1996;Wetherell and Edley 1999), or emotionally stoic (Greenebaum and Dexter 2018). These latter norms, in turn, may intersect with masculine norms related to in/fertility.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Hegemonic Masculinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These latter norms, in turn, may intersect with masculine norms related to in/fertility. For example, virile men may be expected to live up to norms of rationality and strength as well (Greenebaum and Dexter 2018;Johnson Jr 2010). In taking the concept of hegemonic masculinity as a heuristic tool, then, this study teases out how representations of men living with their infertility relate to certain masculine norms, and, by extension, whether and how these represented men may be understood as being in a position of power.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Hegemonic Masculinitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations