2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2016.05.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vectorial total generalized variation for accelerated multi-channel multi-contrast MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been successfully employed as a regularizer in grey-valued image processing in [4,5,6,22]. Recently, the T GV 2 (u) has been extended to vector-valued images for regularization in joint reconstruction of PET and MR images [23] and multi-channel/contrast MR images [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been successfully employed as a regularizer in grey-valued image processing in [4,5,6,22]. Recently, the T GV 2 (u) has been extended to vector-valued images for regularization in joint reconstruction of PET and MR images [23] and multi-channel/contrast MR images [10].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, further improvement was demonstrated by reconstructing multiple clinical contrasts jointly. This idea was previously investigated for PI‐CS reconstructions where additional sparsity constraints along the contrast dimension were used, and this concept has now also been applied to deep learning . By exploiting the redundancy across the jointly reconstructed contrasts, these techniques enable better image quality than single‐contrast methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, colour TV (CTV) and group ℓ 1 ‐sparsity are used to exploit common information across contrasts, and individual TV and ℓ 1 ‐sparsity are used to prevent leakage‐of‐features. SIMIT is demonstrated for multi‐contrast imaging, where the resulting optimization problem is solved efficiently via an adaptation of Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) . First, SIMIT is compared against alternative reconstructions that only use individual ℓ 1 ‐sparsity and TV terms (Indiv‐only) or only use the joint terms CTV and group ℓ 1 ‐sparsity (Joint‐only), on a numerical phantom dataset.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SIMIT is demonstrated for multi-contrast imaging, where the resulting optimization problem is solved efficiently via an adaptation 59 of Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM). 27,60,61 First, SIMIT is compared against alternative reconstructions that only use individual ℓ 1 -sparsity and TV terms (Indiv-only) 59 or only use the joint terms CTV and group ℓ 1 -sparsity (Joint-only), 62 on a numerical phantom dataset. The phantom only included a single-channel receiver coil to isolate potential leakage artefacts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%