2011
DOI: 10.1215/ijm/1355927040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vector-valued decoupling and the Burkholder–Davis–Gundy inequality

Abstract: Let X be a (quasi-)Banach space. Let d = (dn) n≥1 be an X-valued sequence of random variables adapted to a filtration (Fn) n≥1 on a probability space (Ω, A, P), define F∞ := σ(Fn : n ≥ 1) and let e = (en) n≥1 be a F∞-conditionally independent sequence on (Ω, A, P) such that L(dn | F n−1 ) = L(en | F∞) for all n ≥ 1 (F 0 = {Ω, ∅}). If there exists a p ∈ (0, ∞) and a constant Dp independent of d and e such that one has, for all n ≥ 1,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
69
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
69
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, also in this setting there is some hope that C γ p,Y C X √ p for p large, and by the argument in Theorem 2.4 this would yield exponential tail estimates again. Recently, in [8] it has been proved that C γ p,Y C X p for p large. This yields exponential estimates, but no exponential quadratic estimates as one would expect.…”
Section: Extensions Of the Results For Spaces With Property (α)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, also in this setting there is some hope that C γ p,Y C X √ p for p large, and by the argument in Theorem 2.4 this would yield exponential tail estimates again. Recently, in [8] it has been proved that C γ p,Y C X p for p large. This yields exponential estimates, but no exponential quadratic estimates as one would expect.…”
Section: Extensions Of the Results For Spaces With Property (α)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in this case L Φ (T ) is not a Banach space, but only a quasi-Banach space. Some evidence for the conjecture can be found in [11,Theorem 4.1] and [19, Theorem 1.1] where analogues of Lemma 2.6 can be found (only Φ ∈ ∆ 2 is needed in the proof). Doob's inequality plays a less prominent role for UMD − because of [11,Lemma 2.2].…”
Section: Proof Of Corollary 33 (I) ⇒(Ii)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Some evidence for the conjecture can be found in [11,Theorem 4.1] and [19, Theorem 1.1] where analogues of Lemma 2.6 can be found (only Φ ∈ ∆ 2 is needed in the proof). Doob's inequality plays a less prominent role for UMD − because of [11,Lemma 2.2]. Similar questions can be asked for the possibly more restrictive "decoupling property" of a quasi-Banach space X introduced in [10,11].…”
Section: Proof Of Corollary 33 (I) ⇒(Ii)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To prove this result we use the Burkholder-Davis-Gundy inequality for real-valued processes. Using Banach space valued versions [12,33], one can derive more general estimates.…”
Section: 1mentioning
confidence: 99%