Vector Driven 2.5D Printing with Non-Photorealistic Rendering

O'Dowd, Paul; Parraman, Carinna; Harding, Mikaela

doi:10.2352/issn.2470-1173.2016.20.color-343

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Introduction1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2021

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There have been works in improving quality of 2.5D printing including characterization of relief printers [3], printing gloss effects [4], development of a 2.5D printing machine with a software [5], and proposal of a novel approach for a 2.5D printing based on semantic information [6]. Presently, 2.5D printing is used widely in many applications such as decoration (e.g., interior design), signage, and maps (e.g., for visually impaired people), to name a few.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Quality Assessment of 2.5D Prints Using 2D Image Quality Metrics

2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Quality assessment is an important aspect in a variety of application areas. In this work, the objective quality assessment of 2.5D prints was performed. The work is done on camera captures under both diffuse (single-shot) and directional (multiple-shot) illumination. Current state-of-the-art 2D full-reference image quality metrics were used to predict the quality of 2.5D prints. The results showed that the selected metrics can detect differences between the prints as well as between a print and its 2D reference image. Moreover, the metrics better detected differences in the multiple-shot set-up captures than in the single-shot set-up ones. Although the results are based on a limited number of images, they show existing metrics’ ability to work with 2.5D prints under limited conditions.

show abstract