1999
DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-29-4-474
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vector competition analysis of black spruce seedling responses to nutrient loading and vegetation control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6a and b), suggesting that N fertilization alone is not a suitable silvicultural treatment. In addition, when understory is not removed, the majority of the applied N may be taken up by the understory vegetation, promoting understory vegetation growth and causing further competition for N and moisture (Chang et al, 1996b;Imo and Timmer, 1999).…”
Section: Vector Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6a and b), suggesting that N fertilization alone is not a suitable silvicultural treatment. In addition, when understory is not removed, the majority of the applied N may be taken up by the understory vegetation, promoting understory vegetation growth and causing further competition for N and moisture (Chang et al, 1996b;Imo and Timmer, 1999).…”
Section: Vector Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Irwin et al (1998), for example, reported positive post-outplanting growth responses for the fall fertilization of slash pine seedlings on five operational planting sites and Imo and Timmer (1999) found that the post-outplanting growth of nutrient loaded black spruce seedlings was superior to that of unloaded seedlings under a variety of vegetation control treatments on several planting sites. Fall fertilization of Douglas-fir seedlings resulted in increased internal translocation of N from old to new tissue resulting in increased post outplanting performance (van den Driessche, 1985).…”
Section: Seedling Development Post-outplantingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seedlings are lifted and outplanted from December through early March in the Southeastern U.S. Winter fertilization in the nursery may provide seedlings with additional amounts of N right before lifting. This may be a way for seedlings to carry fertilizer with them to the field so that it is unavailable to competing vegetation (Imo and Timmer, 1999;Margolis and Waring, 1986b) yet result in superior outplanting performance. It is not clear, however, if seedlings are physiologically active enough to absorb winter fertilizer N, and if so, what would be the response to this additional fertility both in terms of seedling morphology and outplanting performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this model, tree-weed or tree-crop interactions are evaluated in a bivariate model depicting vectors of changing biomass and nutrient uptake relative to competition-free status, while interpretation of the mechanisms involved are based on vector nutrient diagnosis (Haase and Rose 1995;Timmer 1991). A similar approach has been used to study competition for nutrients and moisture between Pinus radiata trees and pasture in an agroforestry situation in New Zealand (Mead and Mansur 1993), screen alternative vegetation management strategies in forest plantations (Imo and Timmer 1999), and tree-crop interactions in alley cropping systems (Imo and Timmer 2000). The advantage of this graphical diagnostic approach is that vector patterns simplify interpretation of treatment responses, facilitate multiple site and treatment comparisons, and identify possible mechanisms associated with observed crop responses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%