2007
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2007.11.9958
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

VCAP-AMP-VECP Compared With Biweekly CHOP for Adult T-Cell Leukemia-Lymphoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study JCOG9801

Abstract: The longer OS at 3 years and higher CR rate with VCAP-AMP-VECP compared with biweekly CHOP suggest that VCAP-AMP-VECP might be a more effective regimen at the expense of higher toxicities, providing the basis for future investigations in the treatment of ATLL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

11
332
3
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 425 publications
(363 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
(17 reference statements)
11
332
3
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL/ATLL) was established as a distinct clinical entity in Japan in 1977 (Uchiyama et al 1977), and it is associated with a poor prognosis (Tsukasaki et al 2007). ATL/ATLL cells were initially shown to be positive for mature T-cell surface antigens CD3, CD4, and CD25, and negative for CD8 with rare occasions of double negativity or double positivity for CD4 and CD8 (Hattori et al 1981;Hattori et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma (ATL/ATLL) was established as a distinct clinical entity in Japan in 1977 (Uchiyama et al 1977), and it is associated with a poor prognosis (Tsukasaki et al 2007). ATL/ATLL cells were initially shown to be positive for mature T-cell surface antigens CD3, CD4, and CD25, and negative for CD8 with rare occasions of double negativity or double positivity for CD4 and CD8 (Hattori et al 1981;Hattori et al 1991).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The unfavorable chronic type of ATL was defined according to previous criteria. 4 The diagnosis of ATL was based on clinical features, histologically and/or cytologically proven mature T-cell malignancy, the presence of the anti-HTLV-1 Ab and the monoclonal integration of HTLV-1 original DNA into tumor cells, as described previously. 2,23,24 A total of 336 patients were excluded from the 497 patients whose data were available because they did not achieve CR after CHT or allo-SCT (Figure 1).…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The intrathecal administration of CHT as prophylaxis for CNS relapse was performed based on the decision of clinicians before 2007, and was then routinely performed after 2007 as described previously in a phase III clinical trial for aggressive ATL. 4 No patient received mogamulizumab before achieving the first CR. Relapse after the first CR was observed in 79 of the remaining 161 patients, and these patients were included in this analysis.…”
Section: Patient Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Large prospective series did indicate a higher relapse rate and a poorer survival for PTCL than DLBCL [2,[5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. Various chemotherapy regimens have been tried out--such as MegaCHOP (intensive or higher dose of CHOP) with or without etoposide [14,15], epirubicin substituted for doxorubicin and addition of bleomycin (CEOP-B) [16], CMED (cyclophosphamide, etoposide, methotrexate, and dexamethasone) [17], CHOP or MegaCHOP/ESHAP (etoposide, cisplatin, cytarabine and prednisone) [18,19] and VCAP-AMP-VECP (vincristine, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VCAP); doxorubicin, ranimustine, and prednisone (AMP); vindesine, etoposide, carboplatin, and prednisone (VECP)) [20]; fractionated cyclophosphamide, vincristine, doxorubicin and dexamethasone alternating with high doses of methotrexate and cytarabine (hyperCVAD) [21,22]--with no superior efficacy to CHOP except CMED at the expense of higher treatment toxicity. Gemcitabine-based chemotherapies are emerging and seem quite compromising [23][24][25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%