Objective
Animal models of combined TBI and hemorrhagic shock (HS) suggest a benefit of HBOC-based resuscitation, but their use remains controversial and little is known of the specific effects of TBI and high-pressure (large arterial injury) bleeding on resuscitation. We examine the effect of TBI and aortic tear injury on low volume HBOC resuscitation in a swine polytrauma model and hypothesize that HBOC-based resuscitation will improve survival in the setting of aortic tear regardless of the presence of TBI.
Methods
Anesthetized swine subjected to HS with aortic tear +/− fluid percussion TBI underwent equivalent limited resuscitation with HBOC, LR, or HBOC+nitroglycerine (NTG) (vasoattenuated HBOC) and were observed for 6 hours.
Results
There was no independent effect of TBI on survival time after adjustment for fluid type and there was no interaction between TBI and resuscitation fluid type. However, total catheter hemorrhage volume required to reach target shock blood pressure was less with TBI (14.0 ml/kg [12.4, 15.6]) vs. HS-only (21.0 ml/kg [19.5, 22.5]), with equivalent lactate accumulation.
Conclusion
TBI did not affect survival in this polytrauma model, but less hemorrhage was required in the presence of TBI to achieve an equivalent degree of shock suggesting globally impaired cardiovascular response to hemorrhage in the presence of TBI. There was also no benefit of HBOC-based fluid resuscitation over LR, contrary to models using liver injury as the source of hemorrhage. Considering wound location is of paramount importance when choosing resuscitation strategy.