2015
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.3469
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vasculogenic mimicry is a major feature and novel predictor of poor prognosis in patients with orbital rhabdomyosarcoma

Abstract: Abstract. Vasculogenic mimicry (VM) is a key developmental program, frequently activated during cancer invasion and metastasis. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the role of VM in orbital rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the correlation between VM and tumor differentiation, recurrence and survival duration, as well as the contribution of epithelial cell kinase (EphA2) and matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) in VM initiation. A total of 32 patients were enrolled to investigate the associations between VM in or… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(24 reference statements)
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Strikingly, reports in ovarian and colorectal cancers classified as VM+ showed lower survival time in the magnitude of years compared to VM- tumors (30, 31). Similar differences were observed in orbital rhabdomyosarcoma and adrenocorticoid carcinomas (32, 33). Gastric cancer patients with PAS+ structures were prone to present higher histological grade, metastasis, distant recurrence, and 12 months less cumulative OS (34).…”
Section: Why Should We Care About Vm?supporting
confidence: 78%
“…Strikingly, reports in ovarian and colorectal cancers classified as VM+ showed lower survival time in the magnitude of years compared to VM- tumors (30, 31). Similar differences were observed in orbital rhabdomyosarcoma and adrenocorticoid carcinomas (32, 33). Gastric cancer patients with PAS+ structures were prone to present higher histological grade, metastasis, distant recurrence, and 12 months less cumulative OS (34).…”
Section: Why Should We Care About Vm?supporting
confidence: 78%
“…The VM channels are not lined by endothelial cells, but by tumor cells instead, and therefore are not stained by endothelial markers, including CD31 [ 59 ]. A higher incidence of VM has been described in tumors presenting necrosis, as well as in ARMS, and has been associated with poor prognosis [ 60 , 61 ]. The faster growth of ARMS compared to ERMS may explain the different pattern of neovessels in the two variants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Transwell assays were used to evaluate the invasion of the cells in six groups. A total of 4x10 4 MHCC-97H cells were seeded in the upper chamber (24-well plates, 8-µm pores) coated with Matrigel (10 µg/hole) extracellular matrix (ECM) gel and media containing 10% FBS was placed in the lower chamber. The chambers were incubated at 37˚C in 5% CO 2 for 48 h. Invasive cells at the bottom of the membrane were stained with 0.1% crystal violet and were counted under a microscopic.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…VM is a microvascular channel which occurs de novo without the presence of endothelial cells (3). In VM, tumor cells arrange in lines to form vessel-like structure effectively mimicking a true vascular endothelium, which provide tumors with blood perfusion and promote tumor metastasis (4,5). VM has been reported in HCC (6) and other types of tumors including ovarian cancer (7), melanoma (8), osteosarcoma (9) and prostatic cancer (10).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%