2015
DOI: 10.1002/micr.22521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascularized proximal fibula epiphyseal transfer for distal radius reconstruction in children: A systematic review

Abstract: IV © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Microsurgery 36:705-711, 2016.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of this injury is due to the proximity of the peroneal nerve to the anterior tibial vascular supply of the fibula head, making isolation and protection of this nerve difficult. 18,22,23 Caution must be taken to isolate and protect this nerve during fibula dissection. Some surgeons advocate for dividing branches of the peroneal nerve at the musculature and performing coaptation after fibula harvest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The frequency of this injury is due to the proximity of the peroneal nerve to the anterior tibial vascular supply of the fibula head, making isolation and protection of this nerve difficult. 18,22,23 Caution must be taken to isolate and protect this nerve during fibula dissection. Some surgeons advocate for dividing branches of the peroneal nerve at the musculature and performing coaptation after fibula harvest.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The common complications in the radius reconstruction are radial deviation and wrist subluxation, which often necessitate second surgery to correct or stabilize. Salah [50] reviewed 25 patients who underwent distal radius reconstruction, in which 16 patients developed recipient site complication, among which 4 patients had premature growth plate closure, 6 patient had radial deviation, and 4 patient had ulnar deviation or wrist subluxation.…”
Section: Proximal Fibular Epiphyseal Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our 44.8% overall complication rate is similar to that reported by other studies within the pediatric population (25-100%). 4,7,12,14,17,[20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] One exception is our rate of neurologic injury (3.4%), which is much lower than other published reports. While most frequently seen as a donor-site complication, the single neurologic complication in our series was in the recipient site, where the patient experienced a deep peroneal nerve palsy secondary to postoperative swelling.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…2,6,[9][10][11] Transfer of the proximal fibula with the epiphysis allows for biological joint reconstruction, and the active viable physis has the advantage of preserving longitudinal growth. [12][13][14] The vascularized graft is also particularly useful in cases where there is poor tissue quality of the reconstructive bed such as in posttraumatic scarring or following chemotherapy. 4,9,15 Large cohorts with extended follow-up are important for understanding the long-term impact of the procedure; however, the majority of the current literature has focused on the adult population.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%