2005
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.d.02593
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascularized Compared with Nonvascularized Fibular Grafts for Large Osteonecrotic Lesions of the Femoral Head

Abstract: Vascularized fibular grafting was associated with better clinical results and was more effective than nonvascularized fibular grafting for the prevention of collapse of the femoral head in a matched population with a Steinberg Stage-IIC or larger osteonecrotic lesion. The results of vascularized grafting were best when the procedure was used to treat precollapse lesions (Steinberg Stage IIC).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
56
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This provides an explanation for previous findings indicating that insufficient neovascularization precludes delivery of sufficient levels of oxygen and nutrients or therapeutic agents to the lesion center to facilitate tissue repair (27). In addition, after a significant decrease in the vascularization index at 1 week, the rapidly increased vascularization index, to a high level in DRϪ rabbits as compared with the slow increase in the vascularization index to a low level in DRϩ rabbits, also provides an explanation for the previously reported clinical results showing that, as compared with nonvascularized fibular grafting, vascularized fibular grafting effectively prevents femoral head collapse (30), implying that continuous neovascularization insufficiency might be prognostic of destructive repair of osteonecrotic lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…This provides an explanation for previous findings indicating that insufficient neovascularization precludes delivery of sufficient levels of oxygen and nutrients or therapeutic agents to the lesion center to facilitate tissue repair (27). In addition, after a significant decrease in the vascularization index at 1 week, the rapidly increased vascularization index, to a high level in DRϪ rabbits as compared with the slow increase in the vascularization index to a low level in DRϩ rabbits, also provides an explanation for the previously reported clinical results showing that, as compared with nonvascularized fibular grafting, vascularized fibular grafting effectively prevents femoral head collapse (30), implying that continuous neovascularization insufficiency might be prognostic of destructive repair of osteonecrotic lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Of the four articles identified, none presented evidence for a difference between VBGs and NVBGs based on length. The articles, including one comparison of fibular grafts to extremities and three comparisons of fibular grafts to the femoral head [23,34,42,49] did not provide strong evidence that VBGs are superior to NVBGs as graft length increases, nor that they are inferior to NVBGs. The articles provided inconclusive evidence for the existence of a relationship between length and the need for vascularization.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The other three studies examined grafts to the femoral head and showed that VBGs had better radiographic [23,34,49] and functional outcomes [34,49]. Kim [34] studied 100 fibular grafts to the femoral head (Evidence Hierarchy III-2, MINORS score 16 of 24) and did not examine grafts based on length.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although certain methods such as the patient-specific Ioannina aiming device increase optimal graft placement in the anterosu- perior aspect of the femoral head, vascularized grafting still remains technically challenging [40] . Non-vascularized fibular grafts have also been studied as an alternative, but vascularized grafts appear to have better clinical results for prevention of femoral head collapse [41] . Several osteotomies have been studied for the treatment of pre-collapse and early post-collapse (Steinberg stage Ⅱ to Ⅳ) osteonecrosis, with the goal of transferring weight-bearing forces away from necrotic subchondral bone toward other areas of the articular surface.…”
Section: Current Treatment Optionsmentioning
confidence: 99%