2020
DOI: 10.1177/1358863x20910786
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular medicine and cardio-oncology – A new, evolving clinical frontier

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is well known that cancer alone increases risk for VTE and that chemotherapy contributes to vascular inflammation/toxicity and confers further risk for VTE. 10,11 Although 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging is a proven strategy for quantifying serial changes in vascular inflammation 33,35 and has been previously evaluated as a tool for detecting neutrophil-rich thrombus inflammation, 37 predicting vein wall scarring, 38 and diagnosing VTE, 39 to date, no studies have evaluated the utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging for quantifying chemotherapy-induced venous toxicity in pediatric and AYA cancers or assessed if image-derived measures of venous inflammation predicts risk of future VTE events. Therefore, the findings of this study were novel in multiple ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is well known that cancer alone increases risk for VTE and that chemotherapy contributes to vascular inflammation/toxicity and confers further risk for VTE. 10,11 Although 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging is a proven strategy for quantifying serial changes in vascular inflammation 33,35 and has been previously evaluated as a tool for detecting neutrophil-rich thrombus inflammation, 37 predicting vein wall scarring, 38 and diagnosing VTE, 39 to date, no studies have evaluated the utility of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging for quantifying chemotherapy-induced venous toxicity in pediatric and AYA cancers or assessed if image-derived measures of venous inflammation predicts risk of future VTE events. Therefore, the findings of this study were novel in multiple ways.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Cancer treatment with chemotherapy, alone or in combination with radiation therapy, can have off-target effects that lead to vascular toxicity and increase risk for VTE. 10,11 Specifically, chemotherapy induces vascular injury through recruitment of inflammatory mediators, toxic effects on endothelial cells, and generation of a procoagulant environment, 10,[12][13][14][15][16][17][18] which collectively promotes VTE risk. Patients are most prone to VTE immediately after the start of chemotherapy; 19 however, oncologists are often reluctant to use anticoagulants preventatively due to an already increased bleeding risk associated with cancer and chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tumor size and stage, characteristics of breast cancer, reflect the influence of breast cancer itself on CVD. Increasing clinical and basic investigations found that breast cancer itself may lead to cardiovascular complications ( 13 , 15 17 ). A new breast cancer diagnosis is related to an increased risk of CVD death independently ( 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With the emerging field of cardio-oncology, cardiovascular care has become an important consideration for cancer patients ( 15 ). According to the American Heart Association management and clinical practice guideline, CVD risk monitoring should be performed in cancer patients who have received cardio-toxicity treatment (such as radiotherapy, chemotherapy, targeted therapy, etc.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%