2009
DOI: 10.1007/s10616-009-9212-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Vascular growth factor binding kinetics to the endothelial cell basement membrane, with a kinetics-based correction for substrate binding

Abstract: Vascular growth factors, including vascular endothelial growth factor and fibroblast growth factor-2, bind to heparan sulfate proteoglycans in the basement membrane. While this binding, storage, and release system provides a critical model for controlled drug release devices, basement membrane-growth factor binding kinetics have not been fully established. We modified endothelial cell-growth factor binding kinetics protocols for the basement membrane. The basement membrane showed low affinity for fibroblast gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(48 reference statements)
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Interactions between GFs and the ECM are known to be essential for controlling GF release kinetics in vivo, which strongly modulates tissue morphogenesis 28 . While sequestration of GFs within basement membranes was previously reported to be mediated through binding to glycosaminoglycans 47 , our data demonstrate that laminin can serve this GF reservoir function as well. In addition, the laminin diversity in different tissue ECMs and the different GF-binding profiles could be associated with regulation of GF contents and functions in specific tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Interactions between GFs and the ECM are known to be essential for controlling GF release kinetics in vivo, which strongly modulates tissue morphogenesis 28 . While sequestration of GFs within basement membranes was previously reported to be mediated through binding to glycosaminoglycans 47 , our data demonstrate that laminin can serve this GF reservoir function as well. In addition, the laminin diversity in different tissue ECMs and the different GF-binding profiles could be associated with regulation of GF contents and functions in specific tissues.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 46%
“…Interactions between GFs and the ECM are known to be essential for controlling GFs release kinetics in vivo, which strongly modulates tissue morphogenesis 26 . While sequestration of GFs within basement membranes was previously reported to be mediated through binding to glycosaminoglycans 35 , our data demonstrates that laminin can serve this GF reservoir function as well.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 42%
“…Initial FGFR and HSPG surface concentrations were set to experimentally determined values of 2.5 × 10 3 receptors/cell (4.15 × 10 −12 mol/m 2 ) and 1.3 × 10 5 receptors/cell (2.16 × 10 −10 mol/m 2 ), respectively, for cardiac microvascular endothelial cells 32,33 . Basement membrane HSPG surface concentration was defined as the experimentally determined value (4.48 × 10 −8 mol/m 2 ) 16,34 . Initial cell-surface FGF2 was 0, while initial basement membrane FGF2 concentration was 1.74 × 10 −14 mol/m 2 (volumetric FGF2 concentration of 0.35 pmol/cm 3 converted to mol/m 2 using basement membrane thickness of 50 nm) 32 .…”
Section: Fgf2 Model Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%